Koekenbier R[au] - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2008	1
2010	2
2011	1
2012	5
2013	1
2014	1
2016	1
2018	2
2022	0

1

Sender and Receiver Acceptability and Usability of an Online Partner Notification Tool for Sexually Transmitted Infection in the Netherlands.

van Rooijen MS, Gotz H, Vriens P, Heijman T, Koekenbier R, van Veen M, Voeten H. van Rooijen MS, et al. Among authors: koekenbier r. Sex Transm Dis. 2018 May;45(5):354-357. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000738. Sex Transm Dis. 2018. PMID: 29642233

2

What Is the Optimal Time to Retest Patients With a Urogenital Chlamydia Infection? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

van der Helm JJ, Koekenbier RH, van Rooijen MS, Schim van der Loeff MF, de Vries HJC. van der Helm JJ, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Feb;45(2):132-137. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000706. Sex Transm Dis. 2018. PMID: 29329181 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

3

Online-mediated syphilis testing: feasibility, efficacy, and usage.

Koekenbier RH, Davidovich U, van Leent EJ, Thiesbrummel HF, Fennema HS. Koekenbier RH, et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Aug;35(8):764-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816fcb0a. Sex Transm Dis. 2008. PMID: 18496472

4

Young Low-Risk Heterosexual Clients Prefer a Chlamydia Home Collection Test to a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Visit in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, A Cross-Sectional Study.

van Rooijen MS, Koekenbier RH, Hendriks A, de Vries HJ, van Leeuwen P, van Veen MG. van Rooijen MS, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Nov;43(11):710-716. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000517. Sex Transm Dis. 2016. PMID: 27893603

5

Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effective.

van den Broek IV, Brouwers EE, Götz HM, van Bergen JE, Op de Coul EL, Fennema JS, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, Hoebe CJ. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Apr;88(3):205-11. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050219. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Sex Transm Infect. 2012. PMID: 22215696

6

Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.

Op de Coul EL, Götz HM, van Bergen JE, Fennema JS, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van der Sande MA, van den Broek IV. Op de Coul EL, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Feb;39(2):97-103. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182383097. Sex Transm Dis. 2012. PMID: 22249297

7

Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation.

van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Kretzschmar M, Over EA, Schmid BV, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van der Sande MA, de Wit GA, Low N, Op de Coul EL. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. BMJ. 2012 Jul 5;345:e4316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4316. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22767614 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

8

Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.

Dokkum NF, Koekenbier RH, van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, Op de Coul EL. Dokkum NF, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-176. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22404911 Free PMC article.

9

High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infections.

Götz HM, van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, Brouwers EE, Pars LL, Fennema JS, Koekenbier RH, van Ravesteijn S, Op de Coul EL, van Bergen J. Götz HM, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Feb;89(1):63-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050455. Epub 2012 Jun 23. Sex Transm Infect. 2013. PMID: 22728910

10

Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis.

van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, de Feijter EM, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Koekenbier RH, van Ravesteijn SM, de Coul EL. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: koekenbier rh. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Apr 7;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-89. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20374635 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results