Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2003 1
2008 1
2009 1
2011 2
2012 3
2013 1
2014 4
2016 3
2017 1
2018 2
2019 6
2020 5
2021 5
2022 2
2023 9
2024 8
2025 0

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

49 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Management with corneal techniques.
Craig JP, Barsam A, Chen C, Chukwuemeka O Jr, Ghorbani-Mojarrad N, Kretz F, Michaud L, Moore J, Pelosini L, Turnbull AMJ, Vincent SJ, Wang MTM, Ziaei M, Wolffsohn JS. Craig JP, et al. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Aug;47(4):102190. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102190. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024. PMID: 38851946 Free article. Review.
Evaluating the Marginal and Internal Discrepancy of Nickel-Chrome Copings Made on Fixed Partial Denture Implants with Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
Ziaei M, Bajoghli F, Sabouhi M, Jowkar M, Nadian F, Manshaei F. Ziaei M, et al. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Nov 1;24(11):826-833. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3586. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023. PMID: 38238268
RESULTS: The mean standard deviation of marginal discrepancy in the PolyJet group, die spacer group, and burn-out cap group was 37.9 15, 68.8 31.8 and 42.7 3.6 m for buccal margins and 40.4 12.3, 64 21.7, and 42.4 2.1 m for lingual margins, respectively. ...CLINICAL …
RESULTS: The mean standard deviation of marginal discrepancy in the PolyJet group, die spacer group, and burn-out cap group was 37.9 15, 68. …
Public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in everyday microenvironments: An updated systematic review for Europe.
Jalilian H, Eeftens M, Ziaei M, Röösli M. Jalilian H, et al. Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108517. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.048. Epub 2019 May 31. Environ Res. 2019. PMID: 31202043
Mean RF-EMF exposure in homes, schools and offices were between 0.04 and 0.76 V/m. Mean outdoor exposure values ranged from 0.07 to 1.27 V/m with downlink signals from mobile phone base stations being the most relevant contributor. ...Levels in public transport (bus …
Mean RF-EMF exposure in homes, schools and offices were between 0.04 and 0.76 V/m. Mean outdoor exposure values ranged from 0.07 to 1 …
Comparison of 110- and 145-m Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction Cap Thickness: A Randomized Contralateral Eye Study.
Zarei-Ghanavati S, Jafarzadeh SV, Es'haghi A, Kiarudi MY, Hassanzadeh S, Ziaei M. Zarei-Ghanavati S, et al. Cornea. 2024 Feb 1;43(2):154-158. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003294. Epub 2023 May 4. Cornea. 2024. PMID: 37186807 Clinical Trial.
Subjects were randomized to receive SMILE surgery with a 110-m cap thickness in one eye and 145-m cap thickness in the fellow eye. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS), total higherorder aberrations (THOAs) and corneal biomecha …
Subjects were randomized to receive SMILE surgery with a 110-m cap thickness in one eye and 145-m cap thickness in the fellow …
Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Anthropometric Indices in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Ghavami A, Mohammadi H, Hadi A, Ziaei R, Nattagh-Eshtivani E, Sheykhrobat MV, Askari G. Ghavami A, et al. Int J Prev Med. 2020 Nov 26;11:181. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_179_19. eCollection 2020. Int J Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 33456737 Free PMC article. Review.
The meta-analysis revealed that CoQ10 supplementation had no effect on body weight (WMD = -0.04 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.96, 1.6; I (2) = 0.0%), BMI (WMD = -0.06 kg/m(2); 95% CI: -0.54, 0.42; I (2) = 0.0%), and WC (WMD = 0.79 cm; 95% CI: -2.83, 0.04; I (2) = 0. …
The meta-analysis revealed that CoQ10 supplementation had no effect on body weight (WMD = -0.04 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.96, 1.6 …
49 results