Similar articles for PMID: 10764189

Year	Number of Results
1976	2
1985	1
1992	1
1993	2
1994	2
1995	4
1996	4
1998	3
1999	1
2000	5
2001	1
2002	4
2003	3
2004	3
2005	6
2006	4
2007	3
2008	3
2009	2
2010	5
2011	2
2012	6
2013	4
2014	8
2015	14
2016	13
2017	6
2018	4
2019	1
2020	2
2021	9
2022	11

1

Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abnormal breast cancer screening results.

Schootman M, Myers-Geadelmann J, Fuortes L. Schootman M, et al. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000 Mar-Apr;13(2):94-100. doi: 10.3122/15572625-13-2-94. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000. PMID: 10764189

2

Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.

Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D. Kerlikowske K, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):274-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-4-200308190-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12965983 Review.

3

Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.

White A, Miller J, Royalty J, Ryerson AB, Benard V, Helsel W, Kammerer W. White A, et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2015 May;26(5):723-32. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0567-7. Epub 2015 Mar 26. Cancer Causes Control. 2015. PMID: 25809209 Free PMC article.

4

Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002.

Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Coughlin SS, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):260-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19. Soc Sci Med. 2008. PMID: 18022299

5

Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women.

Lawson HW, Henson R, Bobo JK, Kaeser MK. Lawson HW, et al. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000 Mar 31;49(RR-2):37-55. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000. PMID: 15580731 Free article.

6

Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.

Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Iezzoni LI. Horner-Johnson W, et al. Womens Health Issues. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Womens Health Issues. 2015. PMID: 25864023

7

Time to Diagnostic Evaluation After Mammographic Screening in an Urban Setting.

Oppong BA, Dash C, Coleman T, Torres T, Adams-Campbell LL. Oppong BA, et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Dec;25(12):1225-1230. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5661. Epub 2016 May 16. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016. PMID: 27182625 Free PMC article.

8

What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.

Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW, Meissner HI, Freedman AN, Ballard-Barbash R. Yabroff KR, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 May;13(5):723-32. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004. PMID: 15159302

9

Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.

Miglioretti DL, Bissell MCS, Kerlikowske K, Buist DSM, Cummings SR, Henderson LM, Onega T, O'Meara ES, Rauscher GH, Sprague BL, Tosteson ANA, Wernli KJ, Lee JM, Lee CI. Miglioretti DL, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211974. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1974. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33764423 Free PMC article.

10

Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among Black women.

Kerner JF, Yedidia M, Padgett D, Muth B, Washington KS, Tefft M, Yabroff KR, Makariou E, Freeman H, Mandelblatt JS. Kerner JF, et al. Prev Med. 2003 Aug;37(2):92-101. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00087-2. Prev Med. 2003. PMID: 12855208

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed