Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1977 1
1978 2
1979 1
1980 3
1984 2
1991 1
1992 1
1996 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2003 4
2004 2
2005 1
2007 2
2009 4
2010 2
2011 4
2012 5
2013 4
2014 4
2015 1
2018 1
2019 1
2021 0
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Similar articles for PMID: 11110541

46 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow.
Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran JP, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Meuli R. Wintermark M, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;21(10):1881-4. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000. PMID: 11110541 Free article.
Significance of enhanced cerebral gray-white matter contrast at 80 kVp compared to conventional 120 kVp CT scan in the evaluation of acute stroke.
Ben-David E, Cohen JE, Nahum Goldberg S, Sosna J, Levinson R, Leichter IS, Gomori JM. Ben-David E, et al. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;21(9):1591-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Apr 24. J Clin Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24768150
Effect of x-ray tube current on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by CT perfusion studies.
Murase K, Nanjo T, Ii S, Miyazaki S, Hirata M, Sugawara Y, Kudo M, Sasaki K, Mochizuki T. Murase K, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Nov 7;50(21):5019-29. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/21/005. Epub 2005 Oct 12. Phys Med Biol. 2005. PMID: 16237238
Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W, Schwarzwaelder CB, Sommer CM, Veloza S, Radeleff BA, Kauczor HU. Stiller W, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.030. Epub 2011 Apr 2. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21458939
Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C. Siegel MJ, et al. Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):515-22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2332032107. Epub 2004 Sep 9. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15358847
Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Schindera ST, Graca P, Patak MA, Abderhalden S, von Allmen G, Vock P, Szucs-Farkas Z. Schindera ST, et al. Invest Radiol. 2009 Oct;44(10):650-5. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181acaf8a. Invest Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19724236
The image quality and radiation dose of 100-kVp versus 120-kVp ECG-gated 16-slice CT coronary angiography.
Park EA, Lee W, Kang JH, Yin YH, Chung JW, Park JH. Park EA, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2009 May-Jun;10(3):235-43. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.3.235. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Korean J Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19412511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Correlation of regional cerebral blood flow measured by stable xenon CT and perfusion MRI.
Hagen T, Bartylla K, Piepgras U. Hagen T, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Mar-Apr;23(2):257-64. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199903000-00015. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999. PMID: 10096334
Comparison of 80 and 120 kVp contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction in PET/CT, using quantitative analysis and reporter assessment of PET image quality.
Bernstine H, Sopov V, Yefremov N, Nidam M, Gabbai M, Sosna J, Groshar D. Bernstine H, et al. Clin Radiol. 2014 Jan;69(1):e17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Oct 21. Clin Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24156801
Low-dose abdominal CT protocols with a tube voltage setting of 100 kVp or 80 kVp: Performance of radiation dose reduction and influence on visual contrast.
Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Nakamura S, Doi Y, Shiraishi S, Awai K, Harada K, Yamashita Y. Nakaura T, et al. Clin Radiol. 2014 Aug;69(8):804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Jun 3. Clin Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24907185 Clinical Trial.
46 results
You have reached the last page of results. A maximum of 10,000 results are available.
Jump to page
Feedback