Similar articles for PMID: 16322412

Year	Number of Results
1992	1
1993	1
1994	2
1995	2
1996	1
1997	1
1998	4
1999	1
2000	4
2001	1
2003	1
2004	1
2005	4
2006	4
2007	2
2008	3
2009	4
2010	5
2011	5
2012	2
2013	7
2014	9
2015	4
2016	3
2017	8
2018	4
2020	1
2021	1
2022	1

1

Current role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast imaging: a primer for the primary care physician.

Shah SK, Shah SK, Greatrex KV. Shah SK, et al. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):478-90. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.6.478. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005. PMID: 16322412 Free article. Review.

2

Technical aspects of breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Hylton NM, Kinkel K. Hylton NM, et al. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Feb;9(1):3-16. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998. PMID: 9617899 Review.

3

Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P, Gruber S, Bickel H, Brueck B, Trattnig S, Weber M, Dubsky P, Bago-Horvath Z, Bartsch R, Helbich TH. Pinker K, et al. Invest Radiol. 2014 Jun;49(6):421-30. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000029. Invest Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24566292

4

Evaluation of a known breast cancer using an abbreviated breast MRI protocol: Correlation of imaging characteristics and pathology with lesion detection and conspicuity.

Heacock L, Melsaether AN, Heller SL, Gao Y, Pysarenko KM, Babb JS, Kim SG, Moy L. Heacock L, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr;85(4):815-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Eur J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26971429

5

Controversies in breast MRI.

Sutcliffe JB 3rd, Otto PM. Sutcliffe JB 3rd, et al. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;42(4):149-63. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2013.03.001. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23795994 Review.

6

Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.

Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, Bluemke DA. Macura KJ, et al. Radiographics. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):1719-34; quiz 1719. doi: 10.1148/rg.266065025. Radiographics. 2006. PMID: 17102046 Free PMC article. Review.

7

The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.

Kim JS, Lee SM, Cha ES. Kim JS, et al. Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):668-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185113505086. Epub 2013 Sep 16. Acta Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24043881

8

Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast.

Kurz KD, Roy S, Mödder U, Skaane P, Saleh A. Kurz KD, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Nov;76(2):195-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.036. Epub 2009 Sep 1. Eur J Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19726148

9

Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.

Wang L, Du J, Li FH, Fang H, Hua J, Wan CF. Wang L, et al. J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Oct;32(10):1805-14. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.10.1805. J Ultrasound Med. 2013. PMID: 24065262

10

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for cancer diagnosis and staging.

Monticciolo DL. Monticciolo DL. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011 Aug;32(4):319-30. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.02.005. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011. PMID: 21782122 Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed