Similar articles for PMID: 16446480

Year	Number of Results
1980	1
1988	1
1992	1
1994	2
1996	3
1999	1
2001	2
2002	1
2003	3
2004	2
2005	4
2006	3
2008	2
2009	1
2010	4
2011	4
2012	2
2013	1
2014	3
2015	5
2016	4
2017	3
2023	0

1

Determining optimal catheterization rates.

Letic M. Letic M. CMAJ. 2006 Jan 31;174(3):349; author reply 349-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1050183. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 16446480 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

2

Population rates of cardiac catheterization and yield of high-risk coronary artery disease.

Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, Galbraith PD, Tu JV, Norris CM, Zentner A, Knudtson ML; APPROACH Investigators. Graham MM, et al. CMAJ. 2005 Jul 5;173(1):35-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041444. CMAJ. 2005. PMID: 15997042 Free PMC article.

3

Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: a phantom alternative?

Natarajan MK, Gafni A, Yusuf S. Natarajan MK, et al. CMAJ. 2005 Jul 5;173(1):49-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050432. CMAJ. 2005. PMID: 15997044 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

4

Rising rates of cardiac procedures in the United States and Canada: too much of a good thing?

Ayanian JZ. Ayanian JZ. Circulation. 2006 Jan 24;113(3):333-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.598789. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16432064 No abstract available.

5

Influence of age on use of cardiac catheterization and associated outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Bagnall AJ, Goodman SG, Fox KA, Yan RT, Gore JM, Cheema AN, Huynh T, Chauret D, Fitchett DH, Langer A, Yan AT; Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry I and II Investigators; Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE2) Investigators. Bagnall AJ, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 1;103(11):1530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.369. Epub 2009 Apr 8. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19463511

6

Use of the cardiac-catheterization laboratory in a defined population.

Kennedy RH, Kennedy MA, Frye RL, Giuliani ER, Pluth JR, Smith HC, Ritter DG, Nobrega FT. Kennedy RH, et al. N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 27;303(22):1273-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198011273032205. N Engl J Med. 1980. PMID: 7421963

7

Development and validation of a simple model to predict severe coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction: potential impact on cardiac catheterization use in the United States and Canada.

Batchelor WB, Mark DB, Knight JD, Granger CB, Armstrong PW, Califf RM, Peterson ED. Batchelor WB, et al. Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):349-55. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.111. Am Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12595855

8

Letter by Neeland and de Lemos regarding article, "Rates of cardiac catheterization cancelation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after activation by emergency medical services or emergency physicians: results from the North Carolina Catheterization Laboratory Activation Registry".

Neeland IJ, de Lemos JA. Neeland IJ, et al. Circulation. 2012 Aug 28;126(9):e135. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.091637. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 22927479 No abstract available.

9

Can Discrepancies Between Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Catheterization in High-Risk Patients be Overcome With Consensus Reading?

Steinberger S, Plodkowski AJ, Latson L, Levsky JM, Zalta B, Godelman A, Cohen HW, Haramati LB. Steinberger S, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Jan;41(1):159-164. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000481. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017. PMID: 27560020

10

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: flattening the cost curve.

Feldman AM, DiSesa VJ. Feldman AM, et al. JAMA. 2014 Jul 2;312(1):25-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4606. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24798052 No abstract available.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed