Similar articles for PMID: 17332606

Year	Number of Results
2005	1
2006	1
2007	10
2008	10
2009	3
2023	0

1

Beyer T. Beyer T. J Nucl Med. 2007 Mar;48(3):331. J Nucl Med. 2007. PMID: 17332606 Free article. No abstract available.

2

Computed tomography, positron emission tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of limited pleural mesothelioma: initial results.

Plathow C, Staab A, Schmaehl A, Aschoff P, Zuna I, Pfannenberg C, Peter SH, Eschmann S, Klopp M. Plathow C, et al. Invest Radiol. 2008 Oct;43(10):737-44. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181817b3d. Invest Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18791416

3

Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and 11C-metomidate positron emission tomography for evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas.

Hennings J, Hellman P, Ahlström H, Sundin A. Hennings J, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Feb;69(2):314-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.024. Epub 2007 Dec 20. Eur J Radiol. 2009. PMID: 18082990

4

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.

Schmidt GP, Kramer H, Reiser MF, Glaser C. Schmidt GP, et al. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun;18(3):193-202. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e318093e6bo. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17762383 Review.

5

Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI.

Cantwell CP, Setty BN, Holalkere N, Sahani DV, Fischman AJ, Blake MA. Cantwell CP, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Sep-Oct;32(5):738-44. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181591d33. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008. PMID: 18830103

6

Comparison of different techniques for stereotactic positron emission tomography imaging.

Novotny J Jr, Nechvil K, Ptacek J, Novotny J, Liscak R. Novotny J Jr, et al. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2008;86(1):30-6. doi: 10.1159/000108586. Epub 2007 Sep 18. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2008. PMID: 17881886

7

Dynamic MRI, dynamic multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), and coregistered 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT: comparative study of capability for management of pulmonary nodules.

Ohno Y, Koyama H, Takenaka D, Nogami M, Maniwa Y, Nishimura Y, Ohbayashi C, Sugimura K. Ohno Y, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):1284-95. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21348. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18504748

8

Diagnostic accuracy of serial CT/magnetic resonance imaging review vs. positron emission tomography/CT in colorectal cancer patients with suspected and known recurrence.

Potter KC, Husband JE, Houghton SL, Thomas K, Brown G. Potter KC, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Feb;52(2):253-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819d11e6. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009. PMID: 19279420

9

Multimodal imaging approaches: PET/CT and PET/MRI.

Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Pfannenberg C. Pichler BJ, et al. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;(185 Pt 1):109-32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72718-7_6. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18626801 Review.

10

[Bowel imaging: a reassessment. Part 2: CT and MRI].

Hohl C, Mühlenbruch G, Schmidt T, Haage P, Günther RW. Hohl C, et al. Rofo. 2007 Jul;179(7):693-702. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963119. Rofo. 2007. PMID: 17592808 Review. German.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed