Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1989 1
1997 1
1998 1
2001 1
2007 1
2008 5
2009 2
2010 11
2011 7
2012 14
2013 12
2014 10
2015 11
2016 9
2017 11
2018 11
2019 12
2020 1
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Similar Articles for PMID: 22966110

111 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.
Gillam SJ, Siriwardena AN, Steel N. Gillam SJ, et al. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):461-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1377. Ann Fam Med. 2012. PMID: 22966110 Free PMC article. Review.
Research learning from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework: a review of existing research.
Steel N, Willems S. Steel N, et al. Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(2):117-25. Qual Prim Care. 2010. PMID: 20529473 Review.
Payment for performance in the Family Health Programme: lessons from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Harris M. Harris M. Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Jun;46(3):577-82. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012005000032. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Rev Saude Publica. 2012. PMID: 22527192 Free article.
'Just another incentive scheme': a qualitative interview study of a local pay-for-performance scheme for primary care.
Hackett J, Glidewell L, West R, Carder P, Doran T, Foy R. Hackett J, et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Oct 25;15:168. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0168-7. BMC Fam Pract. 2014. PMID: 25344735 Free PMC article.
The use of financial incentives to help improve health outcomes: is the quality and outcomes framework fit for purpose? A systematic review.
Langdown C, Peckham S. Langdown C, et al. J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Jun;36(2):251-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt077. Epub 2013 Aug 8. J Public Health (Oxf). 2014. PMID: 23929885 Review.
The impact of reimbursement systems on equity in access and quality of primary care: A systematic literature review.
Tao W, Agerholm J, Burström B. Tao W, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 4;16(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1805-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27716250 Free PMC article. Review.
Design choices made by target users for a pay-for-performance program in primary care: an action research approach.
Kirschner K, Braspenning J, Jacobs JE, Grol R. Kirschner K, et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 27;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-25. BMC Fam Pract. 2012. PMID: 22453028 Free PMC article.
Does a local financial incentive scheme reduce inequalities in the delivery of clinical care in a socially deprived community? A longitudinal data analysis.
Glidewell L, West R, Hackett JE, Carder P, Doran T, Foy R. Glidewell L, et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2015 May 14;16:61. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0279-9. BMC Fam Pract. 2015. PMID: 25971774 Free PMC article.
Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
Maisey S, Steel N, Marsh R, Gillam S, Fleetcroft R, Howe A. Maisey S, et al. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Jul;13(3):133-9. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007118. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008. PMID: 18573761
The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study.
Campbell SM, McDonald R, Lester H. Campbell SM, et al. Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):228-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.844. Ann Fam Med. 2008. PMID: 18474885 Free PMC article.
111 results
Jump to page