Similar articles for PMID: 26355139

Year	Number of Results
1982	1
1990	3
1991	1
1992	1
1993	3
1994	2
1995	3
1997	1
1999	2
2000	3
2001	6
2002	1
2003	5
2004	6
2005	5
2006	5
2007	6
2008	8
2009	3
2010	10
2011	13
2012	12
2013	7
2014	13
2015	17
2016	13
2017	17
2018	11
2019	16
2020	17
2021	4

1

Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).

Dickinson LM, Beaty B, Fox C, Pace W, Dickinson WP, Emsermann C, Kempe A. Dickinson LM, et al. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):663-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 26355139 Free article.

2

An application of a modified constrained randomization process to a practice-based cluster randomized trial to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, Nemeth LS, Ornstein SM. Nietert PJ, et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Mar;30(2):129-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Oct 22. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009. PMID: 18977314 Free PMC article.

3

Choosing an imbalance metric for covariate-constrained randomization in multiple-arm cluster-randomized trials.

Ciolino JD, Diebold A, Jensen JK, Rouleau GW, Koloms KK, Tandon D. Ciolino JD, et al. Trials. 2019 May 28;20(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3324-5. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31138319 Free PMC article.

4

Optimal multivariate matching before randomization.

Greevy R, Lu B, Silber JH, Rosenbaum P. Greevy R, et al. Biostatistics. 2004 Apr;5(2):263-75. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/5.2.263. Biostatistics. 2004. PMID: 15054030

5

Application of randomization techniques for balancing site covariates in the adult day service plus pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.

Roth DL, Huang J, Gitlin LN, Gaugler JE. Roth DL, et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Sep;19:100628. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100628. Epub 2020 Jul 28. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020. PMID: 32838052 Free PMC article.

6

Randomization inference for balanced cluster-randomized trials.

Raab GM, Butcher I. Raab GM, et al. Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):130-40. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn075oa. Clin Trials. 2005. PMID: 16279135

7

An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Li F, Turner EL, Heagerty PJ, Murray DM, Vollmer WM, DeLong ER. Li F, et al. Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3791-3806. doi: 10.1002/sim.7410. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Stat Med. 2017. PMID: 28786223 Free PMC article.

8

A review of the use of covariates in cluster randomized trials uncovers marked discrepancies between guidance and practice.

Wright N, Ivers N, Eldridge S, Taljaard M, Bremner S. Wright N, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25648791 Free PMC article. Review.

9

Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic.

Leyrat C, Caille A, Foucher Y, Giraudeau B. Leyrat C, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jan 22;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0100-4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 26801083 Free PMC article.

10

Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.

Lewsey JD. Lewsey JD. Stat Med. 2004 Mar 30;23(6):897-905. doi: 10.1002/sim.1665. Stat Med. 2004. PMID: 15027079

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed