Similar articles for PMID: 26369343

Year	Number of Results
1952	1
1953	2
1954	1
1955	2
1956	4
1957	1
1958	3
1992	1
1993	1
1996	3
1997	2
1998	2
1999	2
2001	1
2003	2
2004	6
2005	7
2006	5
2007	1
2008	8
2009	4
2010	7
2011	4
2012	3
2013	3
2014	15
2015	12
2016	8
2017	7
2018	4
2019	8
2020	10
2021	1

1

New Solutions to Reduce Discard of Kidneys Donated for Transplantation.

Reese PP, Harhay MN, Abt PL, Levine MH, Halpern SD. Reese PP, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Apr;27(4):973-80. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015010023. Epub 2015 Sep 14. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26369343 Free PMC article. Review.

2

The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.

Mohan S, Foley K, Chiles MC, Dube GK, Patzer RE, Pastan SO, Crew RJ, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE. Mohan S, et al. Kidney Int. 2016 Jul;90(1):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 May 12. Kidney Int. 2016. PMID: 27182001 Free PMC article.

3

The role of procurement biopsies in acceptance decisions for kidneys retrieved for transplant.

Kasiske BL, Stewart DE, Bista BR, Salkowski N, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Crary GS, Rosendale JD, Matas AJ, Delmonico FL. Kasiske BL, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Mar;9(3):562-71. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07610713. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 24558053 Free PMC article.

4

Epidemiology of Kidney Discard from Expanded Criteria Donors Undergoing Donation after Circulatory Death.

Singh SK, Kim SJ. Singh SK, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):317-23. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07190715. Epub 2015 Dec 14. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26668028 Free PMC article.

5

Association Between Organ Procurement Organization Social Network Centrality and Kidney Discard and Transplant Outcomes.

Butala NM, King MD, Reitsma W, Formica RN, Abt PL, Reese PP, Parikh CR. Butala NM, et al. Transplantation. 2015 Dec;99(12):2617-24. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000773. Transplantation. 2015. PMID: 26102610 Free PMC article.

6

Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation.

Tanriover B, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, Radhakrishnan J, Nickolas TL, Stone PW, Tsapepas DS, Crew RJ, Dube GK, Sandoval PR, Samstein B, Dogan E, Gaston RS, Tanriover JN, Ratner LE, Hardy MA. Tanriover B, et al. Am J Transplant. 2014 Feb;14(2):404-15. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12553. Am J Transplant. 2014. PMID: 24472195 Free PMC article.

7

Which renal transplant candidates should accept marginal kidneys in exchange for a shorter waiting time on dialysis?

Schold JD, Meier-Kriesche HU. Schold JD, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 May;1(3):532-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01130905. Epub 2006 Feb 8. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006. PMID: 17699256 Free article.

8

The impact of nonidentical ABO deceased donor kidney transplant on kidney utilization.

Kayler LK, Segev DL. Kayler LK, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jul;56(1):95-101. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Mar 27. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010. PMID: 20347513

9

Geographic variation in end-stage renal disease incidence and access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Mathur AK, Ashby VB, Sands RL, Wolfe RA. Mathur AK, et al. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):1069-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03043.x. Am J Transplant. 2010. PMID: 20420653 Free article.

10

Increasing the Use of Kidneys From Unconventional and High-Risk Deceased Donors.

Heilman RL, Mathur A, Smith ML, Kaplan B, Reddy KS. Heilman RL, et al. Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3086-3092. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13867. Epub 2016 Jun 14. Am J Transplant. 2016. PMID: 27172238 Free article. Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed