Similar articles for PMID: 29438007

Year	Number of Results
1985	1
1992	1
1995	1
1998	2
1999	1
2000	3
2001	1
2002	2
2003	2
2004	1
2005	2
2006	1
2007	4
2008	4
2009	2
2010	3
2011	2
2012	4
2013	2
2014	7
2015	10
2016	5
2017	8
2018	3
2020	1
2021	2

1

BEST PRACTICES IN MOLECULAR BREAST IMAGING: A GUIDE FOR TECHNOLOGISTS.

Swanson T, Tran TD, Ellingson L, O'Connor MK, Rhodes DJ, Hunt KN, Conners AL, Hruska CB. Swanson T, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018 Feb 2:jnmt.117.204263. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.117.204263. Online ahead of print. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018. PMID: 29438007

2

Evaluation of the quality of mammographic breast positioning: a quality improvement study.

Rouette J, Elfassy N, Bouganim N, Yin H, Lasry N, Azoulay L. Rouette J, et al. CMAJ Open. 2021 Jun 4;9(2):E607-E612. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200211. Print 2021 Apr-Jun. CMAJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34088731 Free PMC article.

3

Nuclear Medicine Technologists' Perception and Current Assessment of Quality: A Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Technologist Section Survey.

Mann A, Farrell MB, Williams J, Basso D. Mann A, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017 Jun;45(2):67-74. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.117.194704. Epub 2017 May 4. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017. PMID: 28473461 Free article. Review.

4

Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Bowling JM, Durham DD, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Yankaskas BC. Henderson LM, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):903-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12903. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 25794085 Free PMC article.

5

The Importance of Quality in Ventilation-Perfusion Imaging.

Mann A, DiDea M, Fournier F, Tempesta D, Williams J, LaFrance N. Mann A, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018 Jun;46(2):89-95. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.118.210948. Epub 2018 May 3. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018. PMID: 29724800 Free article. Review.

6

Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.

Henderson LM, Marsh MW, Benefield T, Pearsall E, Durham D, Schroeder BF, Bowling JM, Viglione CA, Yankaskas BC. Henderson LM, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt B):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.001. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26614888 Free PMC article.

7

Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.

van den Biggelaar FJ, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM, Flobbe K. van den Biggelaar FJ, et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;64(4):442-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02310.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20456190

8

Molecular breast imaging: a new technique using technetium Tc 99m scintimammography to detect small tumors of the breast.

Rhodes DJ, O'Connor MK, Phillips SW, Smith RL, Collins DA. Rhodes DJ, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Jan;80(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62953-4. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005. PMID: 15667025

9

Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them.

Harvey JA, Hendrick RE, Coll JM, Nicholson BT, Burkholder BT, Cohen MA. Harvey JA, et al. Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S131-45. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075514. Radiographics. 2007. PMID: 18180223 Review.

10

Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.

Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ. Duijm LE, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1162-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm050. Epub 2007 Jul 24. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007. PMID: 17652282

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed