Similar articles for PMID: 29624482

Year	Number of Results
1998	1
2003	2
2006	1
2007	1
2008	3
2010	4
2011	10
2012	9
2013	7
2014	9
2015	11
2016	11
2017	19
2018	13
2019	9
2020	7
2021	5
2022	6
2023	1
2024	0

1

Automated Three-dimensional Breast US for Screening: Technique, Artifacts, and Lesion Characterization.

van Zelst JCM, Mann RM. van Zelst JCM, et al. Radiographics. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):663-683. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170162. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Radiographics. 2018. PMID: 29624482 Review.

2

Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.

Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE, Lander MR, Lapidus RL, Peterson MK, Rapelyea JA, Roux S, Schilling KJ, Shah BA, Torrente J, Wynn RT, Miller DP. Brem RF, et al. Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):663-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132832. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Radiology. 2015. PMID: 25329763

3

Three-dimensional Automated Breast US: Facts and Artifacts.

Karst I, Henley C, Gottschalk N, Floyd S, Mendelson EB. Karst I, et al. Radiographics. 2019 Jul-Aug;39(4):913-931. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180104. Epub 2019 May 31. Radiographics. 2019. PMID: 31150298

4

Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning.

Lee SH, Yi A, Jang MJ, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK. Lee SH, et al. Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):830-837. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171218. Epub 2017 Oct 30. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29083988

5

Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].

Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K. Melnikow J, et al. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. PMID: 26866210 Free Books & Documents. Review.

6

Breast density implications and supplemental screening.

Vourtsis A, Berg WA. Vourtsis A, et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1762-1777. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5668-8. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30255244 Free PMC article. Review.

7

Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.

Vourtsis A. Vourtsis A. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Oct;100(10):579-592. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Apr 5. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30962169 Free article. Review.

8

Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?

Tutar B, Esen Icten G, Guldogan N, Kara H, Arıkan AE, Tutar O, Uras C. Tutar B, et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1257-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05501-w. Epub 2020 Mar 25. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32215718

9

Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.

Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Hooley RJ, et al. Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):59-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120621. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Radiology. 2012. PMID: 22723501

10

Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.

Hellgren R, Dickman P, Leifland K, Saracco A, Hall P, Celebioglu F. Hellgren R, et al. Acta Radiol. 2017 May;58(5):515-520. doi: 10.1177/0284185116665421. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Acta Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27565633

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

102 results

Results by year