Similar articles for PMID: 32887760

Year	Number of Results
2002	1
2003	1
2004	4
2005	2
2006	1
2007	4
2009	4
2010	1
2011	3
2012	5
2013	5
2014	9
2015	12
2016	11
2017	8
2018	8
2019	16
2020	16
2021	4

1

Dose Optimization in ¹⁸F-FDG PET Based on Noise-Equivalent Count Rate Measurement and Image Quality Assessment.

Rana N, Kaur M, Singh H, Mittal BR. Rana N, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2021 Mar;49(1):49-53. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.120.250282. Epub 2020 Sep 4. J Nucl Med Technol. 2021. PMID: 32887760

2

Effects of injected dose, BMI and scanner type on NECR and image noise in PET imaging.

Chang T, Chang G, Kohlmyer S, Clark JW, Rohren E, Mawlawi OR. Chang T, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Aug 21;56(16):5275-85. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/013. Epub 2011 Jul 26. Phys Med Biol. 2011. PMID: 21791730

3

Clinical image quality perception and its relation to NECR measurements in PET.

Queiroz MA, Wollenweber SD, von Schulthess G, Delso G, Veit-Haibach P. Queiroz MA, et al. EJNMMI Phys. 2014 Dec;1(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40658-014-0103-y. Epub 2014 Dec 23. EJNMMI Phys. 2014. PMID: 26501461 Free PMC article.

4

Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans.

Watson CC, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Carney JP, Townsend DW, Eberl S, Meikle S, Difilippo FP. Watson CC, et al. J Nucl Med. 2005 Nov;46(11):1825-34. J Nucl Med. 2005. PMID: 16269596 Free article. Clinical Trial.

5

Intra-individual comparison of PET/CT with different body weight-adapted FDG dosage regimens.

Geismar JH, Stolzmann P, Sah BR, Burger IA, Seifert B, Delso G, von Schulthess GK, Veit-Haibach P, Husmann L. Geismar JH, et al. Acta Radiol Open. 2015 Jan 29;4(2):2047981614560076. doi: 10.1177/2047981614560076. eCollection 2015 Feb. Acta Radiol Open. 2015. PMID: 25793109 Free PMC article.

6

Clinical NECR in 18F-FDG PET scans: optimization of injected activity and variable acquisition time. Relationship with SNR.

Carlier T, Ferrer L, Necib H, Bodet-Milin C, Rousseau C, Kraeber-Bodéré F. Carlier T, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 7;59(21):6417-30. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6417. Epub 2014 Oct 8. Phys Med Biol. 2014. PMID: 25295879

7

More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using ¹⁸F-PSMA PET/CT.

Pianou NK, Stavrou PZ, Vlontzou E, Rondogianni P, Exarhos DN, Datseris IE. Pianou NK, et al. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30843003 Free article.

8

Total-body PET/CT using half-dose FDG and compared with conventional PET/CT using full-dose FDG in lung cancer.

Tan H, Sui X, Yin H, Yu H, Gu Y, Chen S, Hu P, Mao W, Shi H. Tan H, et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Nov 27. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05091-4. Online ahead of print. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. PMID: 33244618

9

Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.

Chang T, Chang G, Clark JW, Diab RH, Rohren E, Mawlawi OR. Chang T, et al. Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):5891-900. doi: 10.1118/1.4750053. Med Phys. 2012. PMID: 23039628 Free PMC article.

10

¹⁸F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET/CT in obese patients on LYSO PET/CT system: Patient dosimetry, optimization of injected activity and acquisition time.

Usmani S, Ahmed N, Gnanasegaran G, Musbah A, Al Kandari F, Van den Wyngaert T. Usmani S, et al. J Nucl Med Technol. 2020 Dec 30:jnmt.120.258137. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.120.258137. Online ahead of print. J Nucl Med Technol. 2020. PMID: 33380519

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed