Similar articles for PMID: 33122185

Year	Number of Results
2007	1
2008	1
2009	2
2010	1
2011	4
2012	3
2013	8
2014	5
2015	8
2016	11
2017	12
2018	15
2019	20
2020	34
2021	11

1

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Tan LA, Rivera J, Tan XA, Le VP, Khoo LT, Berven SH. Tan LA, et al. Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S39-S44. doi: 10.14444/7125. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 33122185 Free PMC article.

2

Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Massie LW, Zakaria HM, Schultz LR, Basheer A, Buraimoh MA, Chang V. Massie LW, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 29290133

3

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.

Hawasli AH, Khalifeh JM, Chatrath A, Yarbrough CK, Ray WZ. Hawasli AH, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28760032

4

Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Chang CC, Chou D, Pennicooke B, Rivera J, Tan LA, Berven S, Mummaneni PV. Chang CC, et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Nov 13:1-10. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE191378. Online ahead of print. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020. PMID: 33186902

5

Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.

Khalifeh JM, Dibble CF, Stecher P, Dorward I, Hawasli AH, Ray WZ. Khalifeh JM, et al. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct 15;19(5):518-529. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa144. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020. PMID: 32433773

6

Two-year Clinical and Radiographic Results with a Multidimensional, Expandable Interbody Implant in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Kucharzyk DW, Miller LE. Kucharzyk DW, et al. Cureus. 2020 Feb 21;12(2):e7070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7070. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 32226671 Free PMC article.

7

[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].

Wen J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Liu L, Liu YL, Liu Y, Wang D, Wang ZP. Wen J, et al. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019. PMID: 30921999 Chinese.

8

A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Potts EA, Shaffrey CI, Shaffrey ME, Coric D, Knightly JJ, Park P, Wang MY, Fu KM, Slotkin JR, Asher AL, Virk MS, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Guan J, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV. Chan AK, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722. Neurosurg Focus. 2019. PMID: 31042655

9

Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.

Xu DS, Bach K, Uribe JS. Xu DS, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 29290134

10

Surgical treatment of adult degenerative spondylolisthesis by instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the Han nationality.

Xu H, Tang H, Li Z. Xu H, et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 May;10(5):496-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08623. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009. PMID: 19442014

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed