Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1984 1
1988 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1997 4
2000 5
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2011 4
2012 2
2014 3
2015 1
2016 1
2017 6
2018 14
2019 20
2020 20
2021 2
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Similar articles for PMID: 33158905

96 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
How Much Can Potential Jurors Tell Us About Liability for Medical Artificial Intelligence?
Price WN 2nd, Gerke S, Cohen IG. Price WN 2nd, et al. J Nucl Med. 2021 Jan;62(1):15-16. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257196. Epub 2020 Nov 6. J Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 33158905 No abstract available.
When Does Physician Use of AI Increase Liability?
Tobia K, Nielsen A, Stremitzer A. Tobia K, et al. J Nucl Med. 2021 Jan;62(1):17-21. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.256032. Epub 2020 Sep 25. J Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 32978285
How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
Reichert J, Miller MK, Bornstein BH, Shelton HD. Reichert J, et al. Behav Sci Law. 2011 May-Jun;29(3):395-418. doi: 10.1002/bsl.969. Epub 2011 Feb 8. Behav Sci Law. 2011. PMID: 21308752 Clinical Trial.
What do experimental simulations tell us about the effect of neuro/genetic evidence on jurors?
Scurich N. Scurich N. J Law Biosci. 2018 Apr 19;5(1):204-207. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsy006. eCollection 2018 May. J Law Biosci. 2018. PMID: 29707221 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Jurors' use of standards of proof in decisions about punitive damages.
Woody WD, Greene E. Woody WD, et al. Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):856-72. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2027. Epub 2012 Jul 24. Behav Sci Law. 2012. PMID: 22829456
Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
Smith AC, Greene E. Smith AC, et al. Law Hum Behav. 2005 Oct;29(5):505-26. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-5692-5. Law Hum Behav. 2005. PMID: 16254740
What's half a lung worth? Civil jurors' accounts of their award decision making.
Mott NL, Hans VP, Simpson L. Mott NL, et al. Law Hum Behav. 2000 Aug;24(4):401-19. doi: 10.1023/a:1005540229224. Law Hum Behav. 2000. PMID: 10974800
Juror competence in civil trials: effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality.
ForsterLee L, Horowitz IA, Bourgeois MJ. ForsterLee L, et al. J Appl Psychol. 1993 Feb;78(1):14-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.14. J Appl Psychol. 1993. PMID: 8449852
The Impact of Prior Trial Experience on Mock Jurors' Note Taking During Trials and Recall of Trial Evidence.
Lorek J, Centifanti LCM, Lyons M, Thorley C. Lorek J, et al. Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 24;10:47. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00047. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30733695 Free PMC article.
Is Watson for Oncology per se Unreasonably Dangerous?: Making A Case for How to Prove Products Liability Based on a Flawed Artificial Intelligence Design.
Frank X. Frank X. Am J Law Med. 2019 May;45(2-3):273-294. doi: 10.1177/0098858819871109. Am J Law Med. 2019. PMID: 31722630
96 results
You have reached the last page of results. A maximum of 10,000 results are available.
Jump to page