Similar articles for PMID: 33813408

Year	Number of Results
2000	1
2010	1
2011	2
2012	9
2013	12
2014	8
2015	9
2016	12
2017	15
2018	19
2019	17
2020	23
2021	25
2022	17
2023	0

1

Retrospective Study of Radiotherapy Impact on the Outcome of Material-assisted Implant-based Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Ohlinger R, Nawroth F, Kohlmann T, Alwafai Z, Schueler K, Zygmunt M, Paepke S. Ohlinger R, et al. Anticancer Res. 2021 Apr;41(4):2017-2024. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14969. Anticancer Res. 2021. PMID: 33813408

2

Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: Defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Apte A, Walsh M, Balaji P, Khor B, Chandrasekharan S, Chakravorty A. Apte A, et al. Surgeon. 2020 Aug;18(4):202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 18. Surgeon. 2020. PMID: 31636037 Clinical Trial.

3

Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.

Tasoulis MK, Teoh V, Khan A, Montgomery C, Mohammed K, Gui G. Tasoulis MK, et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;46(4 Pt A):511-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.042. Epub 2019 Nov 1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31706716

4

[Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].

Billon R, Hersant B, Bosc R, Meningaud JP. Billon R, et al. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019 Mar;47(3):311-316. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019. PMID: 30738819 Review. French.

5

Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.

Potter S, Chambers A, Govindajulu S, Sahu A, Warr R, Cawthorn S. Potter S, et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 24011501

6

Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.

Barber MD, Williams L, Anderson ED, Neades GT, Raine C, Young O, Kulkarni D, Young I, Dixon JM. Barber MD, et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.08.475. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25238954

7

Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Reitsamer R, Peintinger F. Reitsamer R, et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Feb;68(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 16. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015. PMID: 25455288

8

Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts.

Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Klaassen-Federspiel F, Sir A. Reitsamer R, et al. Breast. 2019 Dec;48:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 20. Breast. 2019. PMID: 31491673

9

Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Sinnott CJ, Persing SM, Pronovost M, Hodyl C, McConnell D, Ott Young A. Sinnott CJ, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2899-2908. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6602-7. Epub 2018 Jul 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29978367

10

Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.

Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S, Henseler H, Heyl V, Ohlinger R, Paepke S, Klapdor R, Krause-Bergmann B. Hille-Betz U, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1146-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4098-3. Epub 2014 Oct 10. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25300607

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed