Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1974 1
1975 1
1977 1
1979 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1990 2
1991 1
1993 1
1994 5
1995 4
1996 1
1997 6
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2002 3
2003 5
2004 3
2005 5
2006 12
2007 3
2008 7
2009 3
2010 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 2
2017 1
2018 1
2021 0
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Similar articles for PMID: 8162545

88 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
The review process for applied-research grant proposals: suggestions for revision.
Birkett NJ. Birkett NJ. CMAJ. 1994 Apr 15;150(8):1227-9. CMAJ. 1994. PMID: 8162545 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Peer review of nursing research proposals.
Lindquist RD, Tracy MF, Treat-Jacobson D. Lindquist RD, et al. Am J Crit Care. 1995 Jan;4(1):59-65. Am J Crit Care. 1995. PMID: 7894558
Reviewing applied-research grant proposals: can we learn from medical journals?
Naylor CD. Naylor CD. CMAJ. 1994 Apr 15;150(8):1207-9. CMAJ. 1994. PMID: 8162543 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives.
Schroter S, Groves T, Højgaard L. Schroter S, et al. BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:62. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-62. BMC Med. 2010. PMID: 20961441 Free PMC article.
Grant reviews: how to do them well.
Koop PM. Koop PM. Can Oncol Nurs J. 1999 Spring;9(2):61-3. Can Oncol Nurs J. 1999. PMID: 10703294 English, French. No abstract available.
The grant application: making yours stand out across the review cycle.
Hurley AC, Wells N. Hurley AC, et al. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999 Apr-Jun;13 Suppl 1:S120-2. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999. PMID: 10369532
Rethinking grant review.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Nat Neurosci. 2008 Feb;11(2):119. doi: 10.1038/nn0208-119. Nat Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18227790
Bleeding on paper II (a continuation of Mole's guide to grant writing) by Caveman.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Cell Sci. 2003 Apr 1;116(Pt 7):1153-4. J Cell Sci. 2003. PMID: 12693407 Free article. No abstract available.
An objective rating form to evaluate grant proposals to the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health: a pilot study of implementation.
Whaley AL. Whaley AL. Eval Rev. 2006 Dec;30(6):803-16. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06288737. Eval Rev. 2006. PMID: 17093109
Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications.
Mayo NE, Brophy J, Goldberg MS, Klein MB, Miller S, Platt RW, Ritchie J. Mayo NE, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):842-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.007. Epub 2006 Mar 27. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16828678
88 results
You have reached the last page of results. A maximum of 10,000 results are available.
Jump to page
Feedback