Similar articles for PMID: 8793795

Year	Number of Results
1948	1
1950	1
1955	1
1977	1
1978	1
1981	2
1982	1
1983	1
1984	2
1985	12
1986	8
1987	8
1988	12
1989	22
1990	9
1991	11
1992	6
1993	12
1994	17
1995	18
1996	10
1997	17
1998	13
1999	10
2000	12
2001	13
2002	14
2003	16
2004	6
2005	5
2006	10
2007	9
2008	4
2009	6
2010	4
2011	15
2012	5
2013	6
2014	6
2015	10
2016	8
2017	6
2018	7
2019	6
2020	3
2021	0

1

A comparison of three brands of polysulfone membranes.

Hoenich NA, Woffindin C, Brennan A, Cox PJ, Matthews JN, Goldfinch M. Hoenich NA, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Jun;7(6):871-6. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996. PMID: 8793795 Free article. Clinical Trial.

2

Clinical characterization of Dicea a new cellulose membrane for haemodialysis.

Hoenich NA, Woffindin C, Cox PJ, Goldfinch M, Roberts SJ. Hoenich NA, et al. Clin Nephrol. 1997 Oct;48(4):253-9. Clin Nephrol. 1997. PMID: 9352161 Clinical Trial.

3

[Comparison of biocompatibility of hemophane, cellulose diacetate and acrilonitile membranes in hemodialysis].

Germin Petrović D. Germin Petrović D. Acta Med Croatica. 2004;58(1):31-6. Acta Med Croatica. 2004. PMID: 15125391 Croatian.

4

Clinical performance of a new high-flux synthetic membrane.

Hoenich NA, Stamp S. Hoenich NA, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Aug;36(2):345-52. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.8985. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000. PMID: 10922313 Clinical Trial.

5

Does an alteration of dialyzer design and geometry affect biocompatibility parameters?

Opatrný K Jr, Krouzzecký A, Polanská K, Mares J, Tomsů M, Bowry SK, Vienken J. Opatrný K Jr, et al. Hemodial Int. 2006 Apr;10(2):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2006.00095.x. Hemodial Int. 2006. PMID: 16623675 Clinical Trial.

6

Biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes: evaluation in an ovine model.

Burhop KE, Johnson RJ, Simpson J, Chenoweth DE, Borgia J. Burhop KE, et al. J Lab Clin Med. 1993 Feb;121(2):276-93. J Lab Clin Med. 1993. PMID: 8433041

7

The impact of standard high-flux polysulfone versus novel high-flux polysulfone dialysis membranes on inflammatory markers: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial.

Kerr PG, Sutherland WH, de Jong S, Vaithalingham I, Williams SM, Walker RJ. Kerr PG, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Apr;49(4):533-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.12.019. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007. PMID: 17386321 Clinical Trial.

8

Biocompatibility and performance of a modified cellulosic and a synthetic high flux dialyzer. A randomized crossover comparison between cellulose triacetate and polysulphon.

Grooteman MP, Nubé MJ, van Limbeek J, van Houte AJ, Daha MR, van Geelen JA. Grooteman MP, et al. ASAIO J. 1995 Apr-Jun;41(2):215-20. ASAIO J. 1995. PMID: 7640431 Clinical Trial.

9

A new synthetic dialyzer with advanced permselectivity for enhanced low-molecular weight protein removal.

Krieter DH, Lemke HD, Wanner C. Krieter DH, et al. Artif Organs. 2008 Jul;32(7):547-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00583.x. Artif Organs. 2008. PMID: 18638309 Clinical Trial.

10

Differences in solute removal by two high-flux membranes of nominally similar synthetic polymers.

Ouseph R, Hutchison CA, Ward RA. Ouseph R, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 May;23(5):1704-12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm916. Epub 2007 Dec 21. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008. PMID: 18156455 Clinical Trial.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed