Similar articles for PMID: 8896633

Year	Number of Results
1972	1
1977	1
1979	1
1980	1
1982	1
1983	1
1985	1
1988	1
1989	1
1990	1
1991	2
1992	2
1993	2
1994	2
1995	3
1996	6
1997	5
1998	2
1999	4
2000	3
2001	6
2002	6
2003	4
2004	2
2005	5
2006	3
2007	1
2008	2
2009	3
2010	3
2011	6
2012	1
2013	3
2014	3
2015	3
2016	4
2017	3
2019	1
2020	3
2021	3
2022	3

1

Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography?

Diederichs CG, Engelke WG, Richter B, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW. Diederichs CG, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 Oct;17(9):1758-60. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996. PMID: 8896633 Free PMC article.

2

Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.

Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Gijbels F, Bosmans H, Hermans R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Bou Serhal C, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Oct;12(5):473-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120507.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001. PMID: 11564107

3

Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.

Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D, Bosmans H, Sanderink GC, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Bou Serhal C, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb;12(1):85-90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001085.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001. PMID: 11168275

4

Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.

Cordasco G, Portelli M, Militi A, Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Gatto E, Lucchese A. Cordasco G, et al. Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 10;14:24. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-24. Prog Orthod. 2013. PMID: 24325970 Free PMC article.

5

Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.

Zenóbio EG, Zenóbio MA, Nogueira MS, Silva TA, Shibli JA. Zenóbio EG, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Jun;14(3):366-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00277.x. Epub 2010 May 11. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 20491821

6

The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.

Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. Dula K, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):80-9. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001. PMID: 11280366

7

Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment.

Dula K, Mini R, Lambrecht JT, van der Stelt PF, Schneeberger P, Clemens G, Sanderink H, Buser D. Dula K, et al. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Apr;105(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00190.x. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997. PMID: 9151064

8

Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.

Al-Okshi A, Nilsson M, Petersson A, Wiese M, Lindh C. Al-Okshi A, et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(7):20120343. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120343. Epub 2013 Apr 22. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23610090 Free PMC article.

9

Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.

Lecomber AR, Yoneyama Y, Lovelock DJ, Hosoi T, Adams AM. Lecomber AR, et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 Sep;30(5):255-9. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600627. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001. PMID: 11571544

10

Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.

Ekestubbe A. Ekestubbe A. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1999;138:1-82. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1999. PMID: 10635103

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed