What's wrong with female circumcision?

Cape Breton Post. 1994 Mar 16:[1] p.

Abstract

PIP: Why should the multicultural society of Canada outlaw female genital mutilation (FGM) as proposed by federal Justice Minister Allan Rock or allow avoidance of the procedure to be a legitimate reason for gaining refugee status? Is this anti-FGM position simply an ethnocentric stance that would be called racism in other circumstances? Canadian objections to FGM can not arise from objections about mutilation of a child's sexual organs because male circumcision is legal in Canada, although it, too, is medically questionable. Perhaps Rock is being patriarchal in reserving his concern for females. In Somali culture, women determine the nature and extent of FGM, so Rock may simply be exhibiting his inability to understand other cultures. On the other hand, it is politically incorrect for Canadian government workers to criticize other cultures, and immigrants are assured that their values and beliefs will be accommodated in Canada. Thus, polygamy among Somali immigrants is ignored. The question is why should FGM be a major exception and invoke efforts at repression instead of a respect for diversity.

MeSH terms

  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Culture*
  • Demography
  • Developed Countries
  • Emigration and Immigration
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic*
  • Legislation as Topic*
  • North America
  • Population
  • Population Dynamics
  • Refugees*
  • Transients and Migrants