Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2012 8
2013 4
2014 3
2018 1
2020 2
2021 2
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

20 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
GRADE-Leitlinien zu Gerechtigkeit 4. Berücksichtigung der Gerechtigkeit im Gesundheitswesen bei der Entwicklung von GRADE-Leitlinien: von der Evidenz zur Empfehlung.
Teufer B, Nußbaumer-Streit B, Schwingshackl L, Langer G, Ebenberger A, Gartlehner G. Teufer B, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Nov;156-157:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 27. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020. PMID: 32863163 German.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision frame-work, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. ...This is the fourth and …
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision frame-work, iteratively reviewing and mo …
[GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence].
Morche J, Freitag S, Hoffmann F, Rissling O, Langer G, Nußbaumer-Streit B, Toews I, Gartlehner G, Meerpohl JJ. Morche J, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:124-133. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.11.003. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020. PMID: 31980320 German.
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should approach the use of the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool as a part of GRADE's certainty rating …
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should …
[GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences: Risk of bias and indirectness].
Kaiser L, Hübscher M, Rissling O, Schulz S, Langer G, Meerpohl J, Schwingshackl L. Kaiser L, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Feb;160:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.11.004. Epub 2021 Jan 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021. PMID: 33461905 German.
We provide GRADE guidance for assessing the risk of bias and indirectness domains for certainty of evidence about the relative importance of outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We applied the GRADE domains to rate the certainty of evidence in the importance of outco …
We provide GRADE guidance for assessing the risk of bias and indirectness domains for certainty of evidence about the relative import …
[GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health].
Morche J, Conrad S, Passon A, Perleth M, Gartlehner G, Meerpohl JJ, Schünemann HJ. Morche J, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 May;133:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018. PMID: 29673801 German.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) interactive Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for tests and test strategies for clinical, public health or coverage decisions. ...We describe the EtD criteria based on …
OBJECTIVE: To describe the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) interactive Evidence to Decision …
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].
Langer G, Meerpohl JJ, Perleth M, Gartlehner G, Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Schünemann H. Langer G, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22818160 German.
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for the use of the GRADE system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and clinical practice guidelines addressing alternati …
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for the use of the GRADE system of rating quality of evidence and grading st …
[GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes].
Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Gartlehner G, Kien C, Meerpohl JJ, Langer G, Perleth M, Schünemann H. Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(9-10):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.10.033. Epub 2013 Nov 11. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013. PMID: 24315335 German.
GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence-high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of
GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence-high, moderat
[GRADE guidelines 20: Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences - inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains].
Rissling O, Kaiser L, Schulz S, Langer G, Schwingshackl L. Rissling O, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Aug;164:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 Jul 10. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021. PMID: 34253480 German.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We applied the GRADE domains to rate the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes to several systematic reviews, iteratively reviewed draft guidance, and consulted GRADE members and other stakeholders for feedback. RESULTS: We de …
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We applied the GRADE domains to rate the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes to several sys …
[GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency].
Perleth M, Langer G, Meerpohl JJ, Gartlehner G, Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Schünemann HJ. Perleth M, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(10):733-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 23217727 Review. German.
[GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes].
Langer G, Meerpohl JJ, Perleth M, Gartlehner G, Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Schünemann H. Langer G, et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22818161 German.
GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. ...
GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. ...
20 results
You have reached the last page of results. A maximum of 10,000 results are available.
Jump to page