Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2010 3
2011 10
2012 5
2013 7
2014 1
2015 1
2016 2
2017 2
2018 4
2019 6
2020 7
2021 6
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

39 results
Results by year

Citations

1 article found by citation matching

Search results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ. Guyatt G, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21195583
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessme …
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation ( …
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. Balshem H, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21208779
This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. ...GRADE separates the process of assessing quali …
This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, l …
GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.
Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, Mustafa RA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, Morgan RL, Gartlehner G, Kunz R, Katikireddi SV, Sterne J, Higgins JP, Guyatt G; GRADE Working Group. Schünemann HJ, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 29432858 Free PMC article.
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should approach the use of the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool as a part of GRADE's certainty rating …
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should …
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. Guyatt GH, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Dec 30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21194891
GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. ...
GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. ...
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.
Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Dahm P, Falck-Ytter Y, Nasser M, Meerpohl J, Post PN, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist G, Rind D, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ. Andrews J, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013. Epub 2013 Jan 9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23312392
This article describes the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to classifying the direction and strength of recommendations. ...Although panels may choose not to make recommendations, this choice leaves those looking for answ …
This article describes the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to classifying the dir …
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength.
Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, Rind D, Montori VM, Brito JP, Norris S, Elbarbary M, Post P, Nasser M, Shukla V, Jaeschke R, Brozek J, Djulbegovic B, Guyatt G. Andrews JC, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):726-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23570745
In the GRADE approach, the strength of a recommendation reflects the extent to which we can be confident that the composite desirable effects of a management strategy outweigh the composite undesirable effects. This article addresses GRADE's approach to determining …
In the GRADE approach, the strength of a recommendation reflects the extent to which we can be confident that the composite desirable …
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Freyschuss B, Vist G, Jaeschke R, Williams JW Jr, Murad MH, Sinclair D, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Whittington C, Thorlund K, Andrews J, Schünemann HJ. Guyatt GH, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Aug 11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21839614
GRADE suggests that examination of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provides the optimal primary approach to decisions regarding imprecision. For practice guidelines, rating down the quality of evidence (i.e., confidence in estimates of effect) is required if clinical
GRADE suggests that examination of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provides the optimal primary approach to decisions regarding imprec
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Akl EA, Norris S, Vist G, Dahm P, Shukla VK, Higgins J, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. Guyatt GH, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017. Epub 2011 Jul 31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21803546
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias).
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl EA, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y, Norris SL, Williams JW Jr, Atkins D, Meerpohl J, Schünemann HJ. Guyatt GH, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017. Epub 2011 Jan 19. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21247734
In the GRADE approach, randomized trials start as high-quality evidence and observational studies as low-quality evidence, but both can be rated down if most of the relevant evidence comes from studies that suffer from a high risk of bias. ...
In the GRADE approach, randomized trials start as high-quality evidence and observational studies as low-quality evidence, but both c …
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams JW Jr, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ. Guyatt GH, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Jul 30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21802904
In the GRADE approach, randomized trials start as high-quality evidence and observational studies as low-quality evidence, but both can be rated down if a body of evidence is associated with a high risk of publication bias. ...
In the GRADE approach, randomized trials start as high-quality evidence and observational studies as low-quality evidence, but both c …
39 results
You have reached the last page of results. A maximum of 10,000 results are available.
Jump to page