Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

MyNCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2006 3
2009 9
2010 75
2011 193
2012 223
2013 183
2014 187
2015 167
2016 174
2017 150
2018 168
2019 101
2020 9
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

1,271 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Immediate loading for implant restoration compared with early or conventional loading: A meta-analysis.
Zhang S, et al. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017. PMID 28351528
RESULTS: Total 29 RCT with 1342 implants receiving immediate loading and 1279 implants receiving non-immediate loadings were included in this meta-analysis. ...Meanwhile, immediate loading showed significantly less MBL change than non-immediate loading. In addition, subgroup analyses showed that the immediate loading indicated slightly higher implant failure rate and lower ISQ than conventional loading. ...
RESULTS: Total 29 RCT with 1342 implants receiving immediate loading and 1279 implants receiving non-immediate loadings were i …
Immediate versus early loading of single dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pigozzo MN, et al. J Prosthet Dent 2018. PMID 29703670
However, whether immediate loading of single implants is riskier than early loading is not clear. PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the immediate loading protocol has more clinical disadvantages than the early loading protocol for single dental implants in terms of the marginal bone loss and survival rate of single implant crowns. ...CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed no significant differences between early and immediate loading protocols in single implant crowns with regard to survival rate or marginal bone loss at 1 or 3 years....
However, whether immediate loading of single implants is riskier than early loading is not clear. PURPOSE: This systematic review and …
Immediate loading of zygomatic implants: A systematic review of implant survival, prosthesis survival and potential complications.
Tuminelli FJ, et al. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017 - Review. PMID 28944370
However, few articles exist as to the success of zygomatic implants and immediate loading of its prosthesis. AIM: To systematically review the outcome of immediate loaded zygomatic implants. ...
However, few articles exist as to the success of zygomatic implants and immediate loading of its prosthesis. AIM: To systematically r …
Immediate dental implant placement into infected vs. non-infected sockets: a meta-analysis.
Zhao D, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016. PMID 26667097
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was aimed at assessing whether immediate dental implant placement into infected vs. non-infected sites produced different effects on implant failure risk and marginal bone loss. ...Compared to the immediate insertion of a dental implant into a non-infected site, the insertion of an implant into an infected site showed 116% increase in the risk of implant failure, which had borderline statistical significance (risk ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.97, 4.80, P = 0.058; heterogeneity: I(2)  = 0.0%, P(heterogeneity)  = 0.997). ...
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was aimed at assessing whether immediate dental implant placement into infected vs. non-infected sites …
Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review.
Sanz-Sánchez I, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015. PMID 24917174
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immediate loading has become a predictable option to restore all clinical situations. The aim of this systematic review was to assess whether immediate loading protocols achieve comparable clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols depending on the type of prosthetic restoration. ...CONCLUSIONS: Immediate loading may impose a greater risk for implant failure when compared to conventional loading, although the survival rates were high for both groups....
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immediate loading has become a predictable option to restore all clinical situations. The aim of this syst …
Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Chen J, et al. J Prosthet Dent 2019 - Review. PMID 31421892 Free article.
Only human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate with early or conventional loading dental implants were included. ...Compared with conventional loading, immediate loading was associated with a higher incidence of implant failure....
Only human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate with early or conventional loading dental implants were included. …
Esthetic outcomes after immediate and late implant loading for a single missing tooth in the anterior maxilla.
Yildiz P, et al. Niger J Clin Pract 2018. PMID 30156202 Free article.
There was no statistically significant difference between the immediate and late loading groups at any time point (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of this study, immediate loading did not have a negative effect on esthetics....
There was no statistically significant difference between the immediate and late loading groups at any time point (P > 0.05). CONC …
Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review
Gallucci GO, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018. PMID 30328194
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Central to identify studies investigating the outcome of implants subjected to immediate placement + immediate restoration/loading (Type 1A), immediate placement + early loading (Type 1B), immediate placement + conventional loading (Type 1C), early placement + immediate restoration/loading (Type 2-3A), early placement + early loading (Type 2-3B), early placement + conventional loading (Type 2-3C), late placement + immediate restoration/loading (Type 4A), late placement + early loading (Type 4B), late placement + conventional loading (Type 4C) with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDPs) in partially edentulous patients. ...The selected loading protocol appears to influence the outcome of immediate implant placement....
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Central to identify studies investigating the outcome of i …
Implant placement in the esthetic area: criteria for positioning single and multiple implants
Testori T, et al. Periodontol 2000 2018 - Review. PMID 29484714
Immediate placement is less traumatic to the patient as fewer surgical procedures are involved and patients tend to prefer this clinical approach with regards to quality of life. ...Post-extraction immediate loading is feasible in infected sites. The correct position of the fixture should follow widely accepted guidelines but the abutment morphologies play a role in the vestibular/palatal position of the implant. ...
Immediate placement is less traumatic to the patient as fewer surgical procedures are involved and patients tend to prefer this clini
Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants.
Kan JYK, et al. Periodontol 2000 2018 - Review. PMID 29478284
Immediate implant placement and provisionalization has been a viable option for replacing failing maxillary anterior teeth as it preserves the vertical existing osseous and gingival architecture. ...The esthetic success of immediate implant placement and provisionalization procedures is influenced by a number of factors that can be identified as patient-dependent or clinician-dependent. ...
Immediate implant placement and provisionalization has been a viable option for replacing failing maxillary anterior teeth as it pres
1,271 results
Jump to page
Feedback