Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

MyNCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1972 1
1973 4
1974 5
1975 2
1976 2
1977 12
1978 5
1979 4
1980 9
1981 3
1982 8
1983 8
1984 5
1985 8
1986 5
1987 9
1988 10
1989 28
1990 31
1991 22
1992 22
1993 19
1994 23
1995 20
1996 28
1997 25
1998 42
1999 44
2000 54
2001 89
2002 92
2003 120
2004 80
2005 79
2006 137
2007 82
2008 123
2009 130
2010 132
2011 89
2012 89
2013 126
2014 120
2015 135
2016 106
2017 120
2018 138
2019 69
2020 0
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

2,419 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Responsible Peer Review.
Karbstein K. ACS Chem Biol 2018. PMID 30993984
Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
Manchikanti L, et al. Pain Physician 2015 - Review. PMID 25675064 Free article.
The peer review process itself faces challenges. Unblinded peer review might suffer from positive or negative bias towards certain authors, specialties, and institutions. ...These challenges have invited criticism of the peer review process itself. However, despite its imperfections, the peer review process enjoys widespread support in the scientific community. ...
The peer review process itself faces challenges. Unblinded peer review might suffer from positive or negative bi …
The Art of Peer Review.
Fraser D. Neonatal Netw 2018. PMID 30567915
Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
Grant MJ. Health Info Libr J 2018. PMID 30499172
Responding to referee comments, the Health Information and Libraries Journal Editorial Advisory Board has been engaged in a large-scale project to review and revise local peer review processes. ...Thank you to everyone who has contributed to peer reviewing for the Health Information and Libraries Journal in 2018....
Responding to referee comments, the Health Information and Libraries Journal Editorial Advisory Board has been engaged in a large-scale proj …
Peer review and journal quality.
Pierson CA. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2018. PMID 29757914
Peer review in hematopoietic cell transplantation: are we doing our fair share?
Giralt S, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016. PMID 27159173
Peer review is believed to be important in maintaining the quality and integrity of research in academic endeavors. Recently, the value of the current peer review process, which is more than 100 years old has come into question. ...Almost all of the respondents had participated in the peer review process, with few respondents declining ever to review manuscripts. ...
Peer review is believed to be important in maintaining the quality and integrity of research in academic endeavors. Recently,
Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
Faggion CM. Br Dent J 2016. PMID 26917302
Thus, to favour the publication of the highest-level information, the peer-review system should be as unbiased as possible. Although the peer-review system is the most commonly used method to select manuscripts for publication, it has several potential limitations. ...This article may contribute to the always-dynamic development of the peer-review process....
Thus, to favour the publication of the highest-level information, the peer-review system should be as unbiased as possible. Al …
Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
Brandon D and McGrath JM. Adv Neonatal Care 2018. PMID 30499821
2,419 results
Jump to page
Feedback