Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2014 1
2017 1
2026 0

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

2 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review.
Meher S, Alfirevic Z. Meher S, et al. BJOG. 2014 Sep;121(10):1188-94; discussion 1195-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12593. Epub 2014 Feb 27. BJOG. 2014. PMID: 24571433
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the choice and consistency of POs in RCTs and SRs of preventative interventions for preterm birth. ...CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of consistency in the choice and definitions of POs in clinical …
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the choice and consistency of POs in RCTs and SRs of preventative interventions fo …
Inadvertent P-hacking among trials and systematic reviews of the effect of progestogens in pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prior M, Hibberd R, Asemota N, Thornton JG. Prior M, et al. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1008-1015. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14506. Epub 2017 Mar 20. BJOG. 2017. PMID: 28318099
This raises the possibility that earlier studies and reviews had been biased by either selective publication or selective choice of outcomes, so called "P-hacking". OBJECTIVES: To compare the findings all progestogen trials and systematic reviews …
This raises the possibility that earlier studies and reviews had been biased by either selective publication or selective choice of …