Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

4 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.
Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, Close A, Vale L, Armstrong N, Barocas DA, Eden CG, Fraser C, Gurung T, Jenkinson D, Jia X, Lam TB, Mowatt G, Neal DE, Robinson MC, Royle J, Rushton SP, Sharma P, Shirley MD, Soomro N. Ramsay C, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23127367 Free PMC article. Review.
Relative effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.
Robertson C, Close A, Fraser C, Gurung T, Jia X, Sharma P, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R. Robertson C, et al. BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):798-812. doi: 10.1111/bju.12247. Epub 2013 Jul 26. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23890416 Free article. Review.
Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.
Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, Shirley M, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R. Close A, et al. Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.040. Epub 2013 Mar 7. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23498062