14601759 17429645 18372463 15645331 21611016 21095083 18342763 19922328 18677486 16132926 18620843 18463876 14534808 16794152 14680779 15453806 14669064 17411924 18305919 21977468 18584246 19277785 19037825 16132935 21322381 20646940 12553348 1709396 - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2002	1
2003	5
2004	6
2005	13
2006	6
2007	5
2008	15
2009	8
2010	6
2011	7
2012	3
2014	1
2016	1
2022	0

1

A new method for choosing sample size for confidence interval-based inferences.

Jiroutek MR, Muller KE, Kupper LL, Stewart PW. Jiroutek MR, et al. Biometrics. 2003 Sep;59(3):580-90. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00068. Biometrics. 2003. PMID: 14601759

2

Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Bick U, Diekmann F. Bick U, et al. Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1931-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0586-1. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17429645 Free article. Review.

3

Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.

Hendrick RE, Cole EB, Pisano ED, Acharyya S, Marques H, Cohen MA, Jong RA, Mawdsley GE, Kanal KM, D'Orsi CJ, Rebner M, Gatsonis C. Hendrick RE, et al. Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):38-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070418. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18372463 Free PMC article.

4

Comparison of human observer performance of contrast-detail detection across multiple liquid crystal displays.

Averbukh AN, Channin DS, Homhual P. Averbukh AN, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2005 Mar;18(1):66-77. doi: 10.1007/s10278-004-1035-1. J Digit Imaging. 2005. PMID: 15645331 Free PMC article.

5

Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison.

Faridah Y. Faridah Y. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008 Oct;4(4):e31. doi: 10.2349/biij.4.4.e31. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008. PMID: 21611016 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

6

Use of prior mammograms in the transition to digital mammography: a performance and cost analysis.

Taylor-Phillips S, Wallis MG, Duncan A, Gale AG. Taylor-Phillips S, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.025. Epub 2010 Nov 20. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21095083

7

Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?

Nees AV. Nees AV. Acad Radiol. 2008 Apr;15(4):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.004. Acad Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18342763 Review.

8

Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters.

Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Sakai S, Setoguchi T, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Honda H. Kamitani T, et al. Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):15-20. doi: 10.3109/02841850903321625. Acta Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19922328

9

Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?

Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Youk JH, Choi SH, Han M, Oh KK. Kim MJ, et al. Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):310-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1135-2. Epub 2008 Aug 2. Eur Radiol. 2009. PMID: 18677486

10

Effect of soft-copy display supported by CAD on mammography screening performance.

Roelofs AA, van Woudenberg S, Otten JD, Hendriks JH, Bödicker A, Evertsz CJ, Karssemeijer N. Roelofs AA, et al. Eur Radiol. 2006 Jan;16(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2878-7. Epub 2005 Aug 25. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16132926

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results