14669064 16142436 12703755 17114508 19378737 15702336 18841852 15453806 18774128 18319282 - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2003	2
2004	1
2005	2
2006	1
2008	3
2009	1
2022	0

1

Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.

Hemminger BM. Hemminger BM. J Digit Imaging. 2003 Sep;16(3):292-305. doi: 10.1007/s10278-003-1659-6. Epub 2003 Dec 15. J Digit Imaging. 2003. PMID: 14669064 Free PMC article.

2

Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers.

Krupinski EA, Roehrig H, Dallas W, Fan J. Krupinski EA, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2005 Dec;18(4):311-5. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-7666-z. J Digit Imaging. 2005. PMID: 16142436 Free PMC article.

3

The medical image display and analysis group at the University of North Carolina: reminiscences and philosophy.

Pizer SM. Pizer SM. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Jan;22(1):2-10. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.809707. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003. PMID: 12703755 No abstract available.

4

Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses.

Yang WT, Lai CJ, Whitman GJ, Murphy WA Jr, Dryden MJ, Kushwaha AC, Sahin AA, Johnston D, Dempsey PJ, Shaw CC. Yang WT, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):W576-81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0126. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006. PMID: 17114508 Free PMC article.

5

Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.

Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Claus F, Celis V, Geniets C, Provost V, Pauwels H, Marchal G, Bosmans H. Zanca F, et al. Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):765-75. doi: 10.1118/1.3077121. Med Phys. 2009. PMID: 19378737

6

Evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method in characterization of simulated lesions embedded in dense breast parenchyma.

Costaridou L, Skiadopoulos S, Sakellaropoulos P, Likaki E, Kalogeropoulou CP, Panayiotakis G. Costaridou L, et al. Eur Radiol. 2005 Aug;15(8):1615-22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2640-1. Epub 2005 Feb 9. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15702336

7

An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

Zanca F, Chakraborty DP, Van Ongeval C, Jacobs J, Claus F, Marchal G, Bosmans H. Zanca F, et al. Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):4012-8. doi: 10.1118/1.2968334. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 18841852 Free PMC article.

8

Cassette-based digital mammography.

Seibert JA, Boone JM 3rd, Cooper VN, Lindfors KK. Seibert JA, et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct;3(5):413-27. doi: 10.1177/153303460400300502. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004. PMID: 15453806 Free article. Review.

9

Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques.

Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI, Costaridou L. Papadopoulos A, et al. Comput Biol Med. 2008 Oct;38(10):1045-55. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 5. Comput Biol Med. 2008. PMID: 18774128

10

A quantitative method for evaluating the detectability of lesions in digital mammography.

Zanca F, Van Ongeval C, Jacobs J, Marchal G, Bosmans H. Zanca F, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):214-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn049. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008. PMID: 18319282

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results