18301902 31039014 21940549 26527023 19277785 19037825 17429645 21611016 27648708 18608020 21370770 18677486 19499307 19896068 21177749 19321669 - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2007	1
2008	4
2009	6
2010	2
2011	3
2015	1
2016	1
2019	1
2022	0

1

Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.

Skaane P, Diekmann F, Balleyguier C, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Abdelnoor M, Niklason L. Skaane P, et al. Eur Radiol. 2008 Jun;18(6):1134-43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0878-0. Epub 2008 Feb 27. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18301902

2

Value of Shear Wave Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Microcalcifications of the Breast.

Chamming's F, Mesurolle B, Antonescu R, Aldis A, Kao E, Thériault M, Omeroglu A, Pinel-Giroux F, Seidler M, Solorzano S, Reinhold C, Gallix B. Chamming's F, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):W85-W92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20899. Epub 2019 Apr 30. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019. PMID: 31039014

3

Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming.

Haygood TM, Arribas E, Liu QM, Atkinson EN, Brennan PC, Santiago L, Carkaci S, Lane D, Stephens TW, LePetross H, Adrada B, Davis P, Whitman GJ. Haygood TM, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):W761-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5238. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21940549

4

[Explorations of breast microcalcifications: Guidelines].

Chamming's F, Chopier J, Mathelin C, Chéreau E. Chamming's F, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):960-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 31. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 26527023 Review. French.

5

Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.

Shiraishi J, Abe H, Ichikawa K, Schmidt RA, Doi K. Shiraishi J, et al. J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9192-x. Epub 2009 Mar 10. J Digit Imaging. 2010. PMID: 19277785 Free PMC article.

6

Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review.

Skaane P. Skaane P. Acta Radiol. 2009 Jan;50(1):3-14. doi: 10.1080/02841850802563269. Acta Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19037825 Review.

7

Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Bick U, Diekmann F. Bick U, et al. Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1931-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0586-1. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17429645 Free article. Review.

8

Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison.

Faridah Y. Faridah Y. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008 Oct;4(4):e31. doi: 10.2349/biij.4.4.e31. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008. PMID: 21611016 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

9

Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Samala RK, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA. Samala RK, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2016 Oct 7;61(19):7092-7112. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/7092. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Phys Med Biol. 2016. PMID: 27648708 Free PMC article.

10

Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.

Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yang Y, Rong D, Yao X, Li K. Liang Z, et al. Acta Radiol. 2008 Sep;49(7):747-51. doi: 10.1080/02841850802116241. Acta Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18608020

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results