21420014 26464559 29267798 23206372 17920501 20835576 27041897 17761624 29617755 19577150 18538228 23960477 24297966 35703618 16527621 - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2006	1
2007	2
2008	1
2009	1
2010	2
2011	1
2012	1
2013	1
2015	1
2016	1
2017	1
2019	1
2022	1

1

early orthodontic growth modification treatment for Class II patients may provide better skeletal and dental outcomes after subsequent comprehensive permanent dentition orthodontic treatment with less need for complex interventions and greater efficiency.

King G. King G. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011 Mar;11(1):49-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2010.11.009. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011. PMID: 21420014 No abstract available.

2

One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review.

Suresh M, Ratnaditya A, Kattimani VS, Karpe S. Suresh M, et al. J Int Oral Health. 2015 Aug;7(8):144-7. J Int Oral Health. 2015. PMID: 26464559 Free PMC article. Review.

3

Perception, knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian orthodontists on the treatment of Class II malocclusions.

Kaieda AK, Lima IFP, Scanavini MA, Coqueiro RS, Pithon MM, Rode SM, Paranhos LR. Kaieda AK, et al. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017 Oct-Dec;89(4):2875-2885. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720170565. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017. PMID: 29267798 Free article.

4

[One phase or two-phase orthodontic treatment: comparisons].

Bailleau A, Aknin JJ, Gebeile-Chauty S. Bailleau A, et al. Orthod Fr. 2012 Dec;83(4):289-96. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2012027. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Orthod Fr. 2012. PMID: 23206372 French.

5

Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.

Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Dolce C, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17920501 Clinical Trial.

6

Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description.

Janson G, Sathler R, Fernandes TM, Zanda M, Pinzan A. Janson G, et al. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):397-402. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400013. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010. PMID: 20835576 Free PMC article.

7

Volumetric changes in pharyngeal airway in Class II division 1 patients treated with Forsus-fixed functional appliance: A three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study.

Temani P, Jain P, Rathee P, Temani R. Temani P, et al. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):31-5. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.177100. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016. PMID: 27041897 Free PMC article.

8

Effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in an undergraduate teaching clinic.

Bernas AJ, Banting DW, Short LL. Bernas AJ, et al. J Dent Educ. 2007 Sep;71(9):1179-86. J Dent Educ. 2007. PMID: 17761624

9

Soft- and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial.

Idris G, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Idris G, et al. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):21-28. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy014. Eur J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 29617755 Clinical Trial.

10

Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.

Wortham JR, Dolce C, McGorray SP, Le H, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Wortham JR, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19577150 Clinical Trial.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results