25055275 11475066 29888152 17429645 16279068 16461531 15131510 14513726 17390952 16132926 12674245 11523102 15191095 15537982 14669064 17411924 17955296 15866131 15774591 17680246 14697370 19703878 18319279 15670993 18716083 16123876 16169887 1831928 - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2001	3
2002	4
2003	5
2004	6
2005	13
2006	4
2007	8
2008	6
2009	4
2010	1
2011	1
2012	1
2014	2
2017	1
2018	2
2022	0

1

The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography.

Warren LM, Given-Wilson RM, Wallis MG, Cooke J, Halling-Brown MD, Mackenzie A, Chakraborty DP, Bosmans H, Dance DR, Young KC. Warren LM, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):387-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11812. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014. PMID: 25055275

2

Perspective on digital mammography.

Pisano ED, Kuzmiak C, Koomen M. Pisano ED, et al. Semin Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;36(3):195-200. doi: 10.1053/sroe.2001.25124. Semin Roentgenol. 2001. PMID: 11475066 Review.

3

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer.

Zeeshan M, Salam B, Khalid QSB, Alam S, Sayani R. Zeeshan M, et al. Cureus. 2018 Apr 8;10(4):e2448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2448. Cureus. 2018. PMID: 29888152 Free PMC article.

4

Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?

Bick U, Diekmann F. Bick U, et al. Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1931-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0586-1. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17429645 Free article. Review.

5

Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.

Kuzmiak CM, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Zeng D, Burns CB, Roberto C, Pavic D, Lee Y, Seo BK, Koomen M, Washburn D. Kuzmiak CM, et al. Med Phys. 2005 Oct;32(10):3144-50. doi: 10.1118/1.2040710. Med Phys. 2005. PMID: 16279068

6

Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.

Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G. Bosmans H, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):120-30. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci711. Epub 2006 Feb 3. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 16461531

7

[Full-field digital mammography with amorphous silicon-based flat- panel detector: physical imaging characteristics and signal detection].

Ideguchi T, Higashida Y, Himuro K, Ohki M, Nakamura S, Yoshida A, Takagi R, Hatano H, Kuwahara R, Toyonaga M, Tanaka I, Toyofuku F. Ideguchi T, et al. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Mar;60(3):399-405. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00000922344. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2004. PMID: 15131510 Japanese.

8

Digital mammography.

Maidment AD. Maidment AD. Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;38(3):216-30. doi: 10.1016/s0037-198x(03)00048-8. Semin Roentgenol. 2003. PMID: 14513726 Review. No abstract available.

9

[DR (a-Se) versus CR (DLR)--is an improvement of the accuracy possible? A retrospective histologic analysis (n = 100)].

Schulz-Wendtland R, Lell M, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Dassel MS, Bautz W. Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Rontgenpraxis. 2007;56(4):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rontge.2006.10.001. Rontgenpraxis. 2007. PMID: 17390952 German.

10

Effect of soft-copy display supported by CAD on mammography screening performance.

Roelofs AA, van Woudenberg S, Otten JD, Hendriks JH, Bödicker A, Evertsz CJ, Karssemeijer N. Roelofs AA, et al. Eur Radiol. 2006 Jan;16(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2878-7. Epub 2005 Aug 25. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16132926

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results