Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography seems to be an important additive method for evaluation of LV function with improved reproducibility compared with LVEF. Our aim was to compare reproducibility of GLS and LVEF between an expert and trainee both as echocardiographic examiner and analyst.
Methods: Forty-seven patients with recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) underwent echocardiographic examination by both an expert echocardiographer and a trainee. Both echocardiographers, blinded for clinical data and each other's findings, performed image analysis for evaluation of intra- and inter- observer variability. GLS was measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. LVEF was calculated by Simpson's biplane method.
Results: The trainee measured a GLS of - 19.4% (±3.5%) and expert - 18.7% (±3.2%) with an Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89 (0.74-0.95). LVEF by trainee was 50.3% (±8.2%) and by expert 53.6% (±8.6%), ICC coefficient was 0.63 (0.32-0.80). For GLS the systematic difference was 0.21% (- 4.58-2.64) vs. 4.08% (- 20.78-12.62) for LVEF.
Conclusion: GLS is a more reproducible method for evaluation of LV function than LVEF regardless of echocardiographic training.
Keywords: Echocardiographic training; Global longitudinal strain; Left ventricular ejection fraction.