Search Page

1

Cite

Share

Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Geras KJ, Mann RM, Moy L. Geras KJ, et al. Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):246-259. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182627. Epub 2019 Sep 24. Radiology. 2019. PMID: 31549948 Free PMC article. Review.

Cite

Share

2

Cite

Share

Optimal gradation processing parameter for soft-copy reading of digital mammogram: comparison between the parameter recommended for hard-copy and other parameters.

Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Honda H. Kamitani T, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2008 May;66(2):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Jul 30. Eur J Radiol. 2008. PMID: 17659858

Cite

Share

3

Cite

Share

How does image quality affect radiologists' perceived ability for image interpretation and lesion detection in digital mammography?

Boita J, van Engen RE, Mackenzie A, Tingberg A, Bosmans H, Bolejko A, Zackrisson S, Wallis MG, Ikeda DM, Van Ongeval C, Pijnappel R, Broeders M, Sechopoulos I; VISUAL group. Boita J, et al. Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5335-5343. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07679-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33475774 Free PMC article.

Cite

Share

4

Cite

Share

Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.

Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G. Bosmans H, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):120-30. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci711. Epub 2006 Feb 3. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 16461531

Cite

Share

5

Cite

Share

Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?

Tice JA, Feldman MD. Tice JA, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jan;107(2):157-65. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9545-4. Epub 2007 Mar 22. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008. PMID: 17377840 Review. No abstract available.

Cite

Share

6

Cite

Share

Consistency of visual assessments of mammographic breast density from vendor-specific "for presentation" images.

Abdolell M, Tsuruda K, Lightfoot CB, Barkova E, McQuaid M, Caines J, Iles SE. Abdolell M, et al. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Jan;3(1):011004. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.1.011004. Epub 2015 Oct 30. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016. PMID: 26870747 Free PMC article.

Cite

Share

7

Cite

Share

Technical developments in mammography.

Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG, Jong RA. Yaffe MJ, et al. Health Phys. 2008 Nov;95(5):599-611. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000327648.42431.75. Health Phys. 2008. PMID: 18849694

Cite

Share

8

Cite

Share

Clinical image quality criteria for full field digital mammography: a first practical application.

Van Ongeval C, Van Steen A, Geniets C, Dekeyzer F, Bosmans H, Marchal G. Van Ongeval C, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):265-70. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn029. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008. PMID: 18319279

Cite

Share

9

Cite

Share

Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters.

Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Sakai S, Setoguchi T, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Honda H. Kamitani T, et al. Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):15-20. doi: 10.3109/02841850903321625. Acta Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19922328

Cite

Share

10

Cite

Share

Validation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography using ROC analysis.

Boita J, van Engen RE, Mackenzie A, Tingberg A, Bosmans H, Bolejko A, Zackrisson S, Wallis MG, Ikeda DM, van Ongeval C, Pijnappel R, Broeders M, Sechopoulos I. Boita J, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jun;139:109686. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109686. Epub 2021 Mar 30. Eur J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33819803 Free article.

Cite

Share