Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2023 1
2024 3
2025 0

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

3 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
. 2024 Mar 15:15:53-64.
doi: 10.2147/POR.S442959. eCollection 2024.

Trends in Systemic Glucocorticoid Utilization in the United Kingdom from 1990 to 2019: A Population-Based, Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis

Affiliations

Trends in Systemic Glucocorticoid Utilization in the United Kingdom from 1990 to 2019: A Population-Based, Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis

Andrew N Menzies-Gow et al. Pragmat Obs Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Associations between systemic glucocorticoid (SGC) exposure and risk for adverse outcomes have spurred a move toward steroid-sparing treatment strategies. Real-world changes in SGC exposure over time, after the introduction of steroid-sparing treatment strategies, reveal areas of successful risk mitigation as well as unmet needs.

Patients and methods: A population-based ecological study was performed from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database to describe SGC prescribing trends of steroid-sparing treatment strategies in primary care practices before and after licensure of biologics in the United Kingdom from 1990 to 2019. Each analysis year included patients aged ≥5 years who were registered for ≥1 year with a participating primary care practice. The primary analysis was SGC exposure, defined as total cumulative SGC dose per patient per year, for asthma, severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), nasal polyps, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Secondary outcomes were percentages of patients prescribed SGCs and number of SGC prescriptions per patient per year.

Results: The number of patients who met study inclusion criteria ranged from 219,862 (1990) to 1,261,550 (2019). At the population level, patients with asthma or COPD accounted for 67.7% to 73.2% of patients per year with an SGC prescription. Over three decades, decreases in SGC total yearly dose ≥1000 mg have been achieved in multiple conditions. Patients with COPD prescribed SGCs increased from 5.8% (1990) to 34.8% (2017). SGC prescribing trends for severe asthma, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis show decreased prescribing trends after the introduction of biologics.

Conclusion: Decreases in total yearly SGC doses have been shown in multiple conditions; however, for conditions such as severe asthma and COPD, an unmet need remains for increased awareness of SGC burden and the adoption or development of SGC-sparing alternatives to reduce overuse.

Keywords: biological products; drug prescriptions; drug utilization; glucocorticoids; practice patterns.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare support from AstraZeneca for the submitted work. AMG is an employee of AstraZeneca and has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; participated in research with AstraZeneca for which his institution has been remunerated; and had consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca and Sanofi. TNT, JC, and BE are employees of AstraZeneca. BS and VC report no conflict of interest. JSS has received research grants for his institution from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche; and honoraria for consultancies and/or speaking engagements from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, R-Pharm, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB. AB has received personal fees and a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron; and is an investigator in clinical trials from Acceleron, Actelion, Galapagos, MSD, Nuvaira, Pulmonx, United Therapeutic, and Vertex. JMF has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi Regeneron, and Theravance; received speaker fees/honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi-Regeneron, and TEVA; received research funding from AllerGen National Centre for Excellence, AstraZeneca, Canadian Institute for Health Research, GSK, National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron, and TEVA, all paid directly to his institution; and has been a member of the steering committee for the International Severe Asthma Registry, principal investigator for Canadian Severe Asthma Registry, and a member of the GINA Science and Executive Committees. TR has received research/educational grants and/or speaker/consultation fees from AbbVie, Arena, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, LabGenius, Janssen, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, and UCB. DJJ has attended advisory boards and has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. DBP has board membership with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Mylan, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, and Thermofisher; consultancy agreements with Airway Vista Secretariat, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, EPG Communication Holdings Ltd, FIECON Ltd, Fieldwork International, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, OM Pharma SA, PeerVoice, Phadia AB, Spirosure Inc., Strategic North Limited, Synapse Research Management Partners SL, Talos Health Solutions, Theravance, and WebMD Global LLC; grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Mylan, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Sanofi Genzyme, Theravance, and the UK National Health Service; received payment for lectures/speaking engagements from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi Genzyme; received payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, and Thermofisher; stock/stock options from AKL Research and Development Ltd, which produces phytopharmaceuticals; ownership of 74% of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd (Australia, UK) and 92.61% of Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd (Singapore); 5% shareholding in Timestamp, which develops adherence monitoring technology; a peer reviewer role for grant committees of the UK Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation program and the Health Technology Assessment; and served as an expert witness for GlaxoSmithKline.

Supplementary info

Grants and funding
Proceed to details
. 2024 Jan 27;10(1):8.
doi: 10.1186/s40842-023-00158-1.

Treatment of glucocorticoid- induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients - a systematic review and meta- analysis

Affiliations

Treatment of glucocorticoid- induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients - a systematic review and meta- analysis

Tristan Struja et al. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced hyperglycemia is a frequent issue, however there are no specific guidelines for this diabetes subtype. Although treat-to-target insulin is recommended in general to correct hyperglycemia, it remains unclear which treatment strategy has a positive effect on outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess whether treating GC-induced hyperglycemia improves clinical outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for RCTs on adults reporting treatment and outcomes of GC-induced hyperglycemia since the beginning of the data bases until October 21, 2023. Glucose-lowering strategies as compared to usual care were investigated.

Results: We found 17 RCTs with 808 patients and included seven trials in the quantitative analysis. Patients with an intensive glucose-lowering strategy had lower standardized mean glucose levels of - 0.29 mmol/l (95%CI -0.64 to -0.05) compared to usual care group patients. There was no increase in hypoglycemic events in the intensively treated groups (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.70-1.17). Overall, we did not have enough trials reporting clinical outcomes for a quantitative analysis with only one trial reporting mortality.

Conclusion: In GC-induced hyperglycemia, tight glucose control has a moderate effect on mean glucose levels with no apparent harmful effect regarding hypoglycemia. There is insufficient data whether insulin treatment improves clinical outcomes, and data on non-insulin based treatment regimens are currently too sparse to draw any conclusions.

Systematic review registration: Registered as CRD42020147409 at PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ) on April 28, 2020.

Keywords: Glucocorticoid-induced Diabetes; Glucocorticoids; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic agents; Insulin.

Conflict of interest statement

CAB has received a travel grant from Novo Nordisk. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary info

Grants and funding
Proceed to details
Review
. 2024 Jan;295(1):2-19.
doi: 10.1111/joim.13739. Epub 2023 Nov 5.

Long-term glucocorticoids in relation to the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Long-term glucocorticoids in relation to the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Susanne Kuckuck et al. J Intern Med. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

The striking link of Cushing's syndrome with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) suggests that long-term exposure to extremely high cortisol levels catalyzes cardiometabolic deterioration. However, it remained unclear whether the findings from the extreme glucocorticoid overabundance observed in Cushing's syndrome could be translated into more subtle variations in long-term glucocorticoid levels among the general population, for example, due to chronic stress. Here, we performed a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023425541) of evidence regarding the role of subtle variations in long-term biological stress, measured as levels of scalp hair cortisol (HairF) and cortisone (HairE), in the context of MetS and CVD in adults. We also performed a meta-analysis on the cross-sectional difference in HairF levels between individuals with versus without CVD. Seven studies were included regarding MetS, sixteen regarding CVD, and one regarding both. Most articles indicated a strong, consistent cross-sectional association of higher HairF and HairE levels with CVD, which was confirmed by our meta-analysis for HairF (eight studies, SMD = 0.48, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.16-0.79, p = 0.0095). Moreover, these relationships appear largely independent of standard risk factors. Age seems relevant as the effect seems stronger in younger individuals. Results regarding the associations of HairF and HairE with MetS were inconsistent. Altogether, long-term biological stress, measured as HairF and HairE, is associated with the presence of CVD, and less consistently with MetS. Prospective studies need to evaluate the directionality of this relationship and determine whether HairF and HairE can be used in addition to standard risk factors in predicting future cardiometabolic deterioration.

Keywords: HPA-axis; cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular risk factors; hair glucocorticoids; metabolic syndrome.

Supplementary info

Publication types, MeSH terms, Substances, Grants and funding
Proceed to details