Anti-infective external coating of central venous catheters: a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing 5-fluorouracil with chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine in preventing catheter colonization

Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2095-102. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f265ba.

Abstract

Objective: The antimetabolite drug, 5-fluorouracil, inhibits microbial growth. Coating of central venous catheters with 5-fluorouracil may reduce the risk of catheter infection. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil with those coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.

Design: Prospective, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicentered, noninferiority trial.

Setting: Twenty-five US medical center intensive care units.

Patients: A total of 960 adult patients requiring central venous catheterization for up to 28 days.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive a central venous catheter externally coated with either 5-fluorouracil (n = 480) or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (n = 480).

Measurements and main results: The primary antimicrobial outcome was a dichotomous measure (<15 colony-forming units or ≥ 15 colony-forming units) for catheter colonization determined by the roll plate method. Secondary antimicrobial outcomes included local site infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Central venous catheters coated with 5-fluorouracil were noninferior to chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coated central venous catheters with respect to the incidence of catheter colonization (2.9% vs. 5.3%, respectively). Local site infection occurred in 1.4% of the 5-fluorouracil group and 0.9% of the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. No episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred in the 5-fluorouracil group, whereas two episodes were noted in the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. Only Gram-positive organisms were cultured from 5-fluorouracil catheters, whereas Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida were cultured from the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine central venous catheters. Adverse events were comparable between the two central venous catheter coatings.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil are a safe and effective alternative to catheters externally coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine when used in critically ill patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / therapeutic use*
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / adverse effects
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / instrumentation
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / methods*
  • Antimetabolites / therapeutic use*
  • Catheter-Related Infections / microbiology
  • Catheter-Related Infections / prevention & control*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / methods*
  • Catheters, Indwelling / adverse effects
  • Catheters, Indwelling / microbiology
  • Chlorhexidine / therapeutic use*
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Critical Care / methods
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Silver Sulfadiazine / therapeutic use*
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Antimetabolites
  • Chlorhexidine
  • Fluorouracil
  • Silver Sulfadiazine