Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

35 results
Filters applied: . Clear all Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. Results by year timeline is unavailable
Page 1
Structural Bias in Studies of Cardiovascular Disease: Let's Not Be Fooled by the "Obesity Paradox".
Stovitz SD, Banack HR, Kaufman JS. Stovitz SD, et al. Among authors: banack hr. Can J Cardiol. 2018 May;34(5):540-542. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Nov 7. Can J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29289401 No abstract available.
The "obesity paradox" explained.
Banack HR, Kaufman JS. Banack HR, et al. Epidemiology. 2013 May;24(3):461-2. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828c776c. Epidemiology. 2013. PMID: 23549182 No abstract available.
The obesity paradox: understanding the effect of obesity on mortality among individuals with cardiovascular disease.
Banack HR, Kaufman JS. Banack HR, et al. Prev Med. 2014 May;62:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 10. Prev Med. 2014. PMID: 24525165 Review.
Should patients with chronic disease be told to gain weight? The obesity paradox and selection bias.
Lajous M, Banack HR, Kaufman JS, Hernán MA. Lajous M, et al. Among authors: banack hr. Am J Med. 2015 Apr;128(4):334-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.043. Epub 2014 Nov 22. Am J Med. 2015. PMID: 25460531 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Does selection bias explain the obesity paradox among individuals with cardiovascular disease?
Banack HR, Kaufman JS. Banack HR, et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 May;25(5):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 20. Ann Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25867852
From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the "obesity paradox".
Banack HR, Kaufman JS. Banack HR, et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;30(10):1111-4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0069-7. Epub 2015 Jul 18. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26187718
The 'obesity paradox' may not be a paradox at all.
Banack HR, Stokes A. Banack HR, et al. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Aug;41(8):1162-1163. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.99. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017. PMID: 28584251 No abstract available.
Letter by Banack et al Regarding Article, "Body Mass Index and Mortality Among Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Nationwide Study With a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
Banack HR, Stovitz SD, Kaufman JS. Banack HR, et al. Circulation. 2017 Aug 1;136(5):507-508. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027312. Circulation. 2017. PMID: 28760875 No abstract available.
Methodological considerations for disentangling a risk factor's influence on disease incidence versus postdiagnosis survival: The example of obesity and breast and colorectal cancer mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.
Cespedes Feliciano EM, Prentice RL, Aragaki AK, Neuhouser ML, Banack HR, Kroenke CH, Ho GYF, Zaslavsky O, Strickler HD, Cheng TD, Chlebowski RT, Saquib N, Nassir R, Anderson G, Caan BJ. Cespedes Feliciano EM, et al. Among authors: banack hr. Int J Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;141(11):2281-2290. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30931. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Int J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28833074 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
In analyses of time from enrollment to death, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m(2) versus 18.5-<25 kg/m(2) was associated with higher rates of cancer mortality: HR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.54, 2.56 for breast cancer (p trend <0.001) and HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.88 fo …
In analyses of time from enrollment to death, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m(2) versus 18.5-<25 kg/m(2) was associated with higher rates …
Is BMI a valid measure of obesity in postmenopausal women?
Banack HR, Wactawski-Wende J, Hovey KM, Stokes A. Banack HR, et al. Menopause. 2018 Mar;25(3):307-313. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000989. Menopause. 2018. PMID: 29135897 Free PMC article.
35 results
Jump to page
Feedback