Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1847 1
1865 1
1869 1
1872 2
1873 1
1874 1
1875 1
1877 1
1879 2
1881 1
1882 1
1884 4
1885 1
1886 2
1889 4
1891 1
1892 1
1893 1
1895 2
1897 1
1898 1
1899 1
1900 1
1901 1
1902 6
1903 2
1904 1
1911 1
1912 1
1913 1
1914 1
1915 1
1917 2
1918 1
1919 3
1920 1
1921 1
1922 6
1923 1
1924 1
1925 1
1926 2
1927 2
1928 2
1930 1
1931 3
1932 4
1933 1
1934 3
1935 2
1936 3
1937 4
1938 3
1939 2
1940 5
1941 7
1942 2
1943 4
1944 1
1945 9
1946 19
1947 34
1948 27
1949 26
1950 17
1951 18
1952 13
1953 21
1954 32
1955 22
1956 23
1957 31
1958 32
1959 38
1960 40
1961 41
1962 43
1963 50
1964 67
1965 99
1966 83
1967 76
1968 102
1969 114
1970 77
1971 145
1972 129
1973 113
1974 132
1975 269
1976 269
1977 290
1978 258
1979 312
1980 316
1981 317
1982 335
1983 373
1984 376
1985 397
1986 376
1987 382
1988 383
1989 376
1990 413
1991 416
1992 399
1993 386
1994 430
1995 464
1996 438
1997 482
1998 480
1999 541
2000 521
2001 510
2002 550
2003 620
2004 660
2005 658
2006 743
2007 959
2008 966
2009 1064
2010 1070
2011 1147
2012 1274
2013 1425
2014 1562
2015 1605
2016 1858
2017 2060
2018 2152
2019 2492
2020 2874
2021 2931
2022 2795
2023 2690
2024 2826
2025 3058
2026 1393

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

48,071 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Beef abattoir interventions in a risk-based meat safety assurance system.
Antic D, Houf K, Michalopoulou E, Blagojevic B. Antic D, et al. Meat Sci. 2021 Dec;182:108622. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108622. Epub 2021 Jul 8. Meat Sci. 2021. PMID: 34265543 Free article. Review.
In risk-based meat safety assurance system, the use of interventions is intended to accomplish the meat safety targets on chilled carcasses, particularly in situations when an abattoir is unable to sufficiently reduce risks arising from specific farms/animal batches …
In risk-based meat safety assurance system, the use of interventions is intended to accomplish the meat safety targets on chil …
Listeria monocytogenes in beef: a hidden risk.
Reis JO, Teixeira LAC, Cunha-Neto A, Castro VS, Figueiredo EES. Reis JO, et al. Res Microbiol. 2024 Sep-Oct;175(7):104215. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2024.104215. Epub 2024 Jun 1. Res Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38830563 Free article. Review.
Listeria monocytogenes in beef receives less attention compared to other pathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli. ...Our findings reveal a prevalence of L. monocytogenes in beef and beef products ranging from 2.5% to 59.4%. Notably, serotype 4b was …
Listeria monocytogenes in beef receives less attention compared to other pathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli. ...Our fi …
The whole food beef matrix is more than the sum of its parts.
Klurfeld DM. Klurfeld DM. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(14):4523-4531. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2142931. Epub 2022 Nov 7. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024. PMID: 36343282 Free article. Review.
The beef matrix can be defined as: the collective nutritive and non-nutritive components of the beef food structure and their unique chemical and physical interactions that may be important for human health which are distinguishable from those of the single componen …
The beef matrix can be defined as: the collective nutritive and non-nutritive components of the beef food structure and their …
Where's the Beef? Understanding Allergic Responses to Red Meat in Alpha-Gal Syndrome.
Carson AS, Gardner A, Iweala OI. Carson AS, et al. J Immunol. 2022 Jan 15;208(2):267-277. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100712. J Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35017216 Free PMC article. Review.
Individuals with AGS develop delayed hypersensitivity reactions, with symptoms occurring >2 h after consuming mammalian ("red") meat and other mammal-derived food products. The mechanisms of pathogenesis driving this paradigm-breaking food allergy are not fully u …
Individuals with AGS develop delayed hypersensitivity reactions, with symptoms occurring >2 h after consuming mammalian ("red") …
Post-weaning management of modern dairy cattle genetics for beef production: a review.
Jaborek JR, Carvalho PHV, Felix TL. Jaborek JR, et al. J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skac345. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac345. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 36592743 Free PMC article. Review.
Beef dairy crossbreeding strategies are being implemented on some dairy farms to increase the income generated from dairy bull calves, while beef dairy crossbreeding strategies can also improve the G:F and red meat yield of beef produced fro
Beef dairy crossbreeding strategies are being implemented on some dairy farms to increase the income generated from dairy bull calv
BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: A role for beef cattle in sustainable U.S. food production1.
Gleason CB, White RR. Gleason CB, et al. J Anim Sci. 2019 Sep 3;97(9):4010-4020. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz173. J Anim Sci. 2019. PMID: 31414131 Free PMC article. Review.
The objective of this review is to summarize evidence of the various roles that the U.S. beef industry plays in the U.S. and global agricultural systems. As the world's largest beef producer, the United States reaps considerable economic benefit from the beef
The objective of this review is to summarize evidence of the various roles that the U.S. beef industry plays in the U.S. and global a …
Dietary consumption of beef and red meat: a scoping review and evidence map on cognitive outcomes across the lifespan.
Paul TL, Fleming SA. Paul TL, et al. Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):2912-2926. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001933. Epub 2023 Oct 6. Public Health Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37800340 Free PMC article.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified that quantified beef or red meat intake and assessed cognition. Six studies assessed beef intake, with the remaining studies describing intake of red meat that may or may not include beef
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified that quantified beef or red meat intake and assessed cognition. Six studies …
A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models.
Tesson V, Federighi M, Cummins E, de Oliveira Mota J, Guillou S, Boué G. Tesson V, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;17(3):688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030688. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31973083 Free PMC article.
Each year in Europe, meat is associated with 2.3 million foodborne illnesses, with a high contribution from beef meat. ...The present analysis can serve as a source of data and information to inform QMRA framework for beef meat and will help the …
Each year in Europe, meat is associated with 2.3 million foodborne illnesses, with a high contribution from beef meat. …
Transforming beef quality through healthy breeding: a strategy to reduce carcinogenic compounds and enhance human health: a review.
Abebe BK, Guo J, Jilo DD, Wang J, Yu S, Liu H, Cheng G, Zan L. Abebe BK, et al. Mamm Genome. 2025 Sep;36(3):787-811. doi: 10.1007/s00335-025-10129-9. Epub 2025 May 9. Mamm Genome. 2025. PMID: 40343484 Review.
The presence of carcinogenic substances in beef poses a significant risk to public health, with far-reaching implications for consumer safety and the meat production industry. ...Our findings suggest that healthy breeding strategies could markedly enhance meat
The presence of carcinogenic substances in beef poses a significant risk to public health, with far-reaching implications for consume …
Recent advances in spoilage mechanisms and preservation technologies in beef quality: A review.
Zhu Y, Gu M, Su Y, Li Z, Xiao Z, Lu F, Han C. Zhu Y, et al. Meat Sci. 2024 Jul;213:109481. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109481. Epub 2024 Mar 8. Meat Sci. 2024. PMID: 38461675 Review.
Beef is a popular meat product that can spoil and lose quality during postharvest handling and storage. ...It also discusses how these methods work and affect beef quality. The review shows that beef spoilage is mainly due to enzymatic and microbial ac
Beef is a popular meat product that can spoil and lose quality during postharvest handling and storage. ...It also discusses h
48,071 results
You have reached the last available page of results. Please see the User Guide for more information.