Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 4
1994 3
1995 9
1996 6
1997 12
1998 16
1999 22
2000 26
2001 42
2002 27
2003 43
2004 39
2005 42
2006 36
2007 40
2008 92
2009 91
2010 92
2011 129
2012 126
2013 121
2014 111
2015 103
2016 105
2017 79
2018 78
2019 75
2020 77
2021 56
2022 59
2023 68
2024 47

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

1,603 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review.
Aludden HC, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Jensen T. Aludden HC, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;46(8):1030-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28366452 Review.
The objective of this systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcomes when using Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone grafts for lateral ridge augmentation. ...Non-comparative studi …
The objective of this systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcomes when using Bio-O …
Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model.
Lee YC, Chan YH, Hsieh SC, Lew WZ, Feng SW. Lee YC, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 10;20(20):5015. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205015. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31658685 Free PMC article.
Four experimental groups (empty control, Bio-Oss only, Bio-Oss+BMSCs, and Bio-Oss+DPSCs) were then designed and implanted in rabbit calvarial defects. ...Finally, the Bio-Oss+BMSC and Bio-Oss+DPSC groups had a …
Four experimental groups (empty control, Bio-Oss only, Bio-Oss+BMSCs, and Bio-Oss+DPSCs) were then …
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review.
Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Jensen T, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Oct 13. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22000958 Review.
The volumetric stability of the graft improved significantly with increased proportion of Bio-Oss. Bone regeneration, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), biomechanical implant test values, and biodegradation of Bio-Oss after MSFA with Bio-Oss …
The volumetric stability of the graft improved significantly with increased proportion of Bio-Oss. Bone regeneration, bone-to- …
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review.
Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Jensen T, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Mar;23(3):263-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02168.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 21443592 Review.
RESULTS: The 1-year implant survival was compared in one study demonstrating no statistically significant difference. The implant survival was 96% with Bio-Oss and 94% with a mixture of 80% Bio-Oss and 20% autogenous mandibular bone. Addition of a limi …
RESULTS: The 1-year implant survival was compared in one study demonstrating no statistically significant difference. The implant survival w …
Alkaline phosphatase immobilization onto Bio-Gide and Bio-Oss for periodontal and bone regeneration.
Oortgiesen DA, Plachokova AS, Geenen C, Meijer GJ, Walboomers XF, van den Beucken JJ, Jansen JA. Oortgiesen DA, et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Jun;39(6):546-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01877.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23. J Clin Periodontol. 2012. PMID: 22519301
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alkaline phosphatase ALP was immobilized onto Bio-Gide() and Bio-Oss() . Forty-eight rats received periodontal defects, which were treated according to one of the following strategies: Bio-Gide(), Bio-Gide …
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alkaline phosphatase ALP was immobilized onto Bio-Gide() and Bio-Oss() . Forty-eight rats …
BIO-OSS--a resorbable bone substitute?
Schlegel AK, Donath K. Schlegel AK, et al. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1998;8(3-4):201-9. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1998. PMID: 10186966
In X-ray controls, BIO-OSS served to identify the surrounding native bone. The density of the BIO-OSS areas was higher than in control sites. ...There were no clinical signs of BIO-OSS resorption. Therefore, we can assume that form correc …
In X-ray controls, BIO-OSS served to identify the surrounding native bone. The density of the BIO-OSS areas was …
Experiment of GBR for repair of peri-implant alveolar defects in beagle dogs.
Li H, Zheng J, Zhang S, Yang C, Kwon YD, Kim YJ. Li H, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 8;8(1):16532. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34805-w. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30410063 Free PMC article.
Six months after extraction of the mandibular premolars and first molars from three beagle dogs, we inserted implants assigned into 3 groups and covered with the following membrane combinations: Group A: Implant + Bio-Oss + Ti-mesh, Group B: Implant + Bio- …
Six months after extraction of the mandibular premolars and first molars from three beagle dogs, we inserted implants assigned into 3 groups …
A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial.
Amoian B, Moudi E, Majidi MS, Ali Tabatabaei SM. Amoian B, et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Sep;13(5):446-453. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.192304. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016. PMID: 27857771 Free PMC article.
The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters. ...CONCLUSION: CenoBone seems to present a comp …
The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveol …
Gene expression and morphometric parameters of human bone biopsies after maxillary sinus floor elevation with autologous bone combined with Bio-Oss or BoneCeramic.
Caubet J, Ramis JM, Ramos-Murguialday M, Morey MÁ, Monjo M. Caubet J, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jun;26(6):727-35. doi: 10.1111/clr.12380. Epub 2014 Mar 31. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015. PMID: 24684367
RESULTS: MicroCT analysis revealed no differences in the morphometric parameters or BMD either after 4-5 months or 6-8 months of MSFE between Bio-Oss() and BoneCeramic() . At molecular level, a higher expression of bone forming gene Runx2 was observed after 4-5 mont …
RESULTS: MicroCT analysis revealed no differences in the morphometric parameters or BMD either after 4-5 months or 6-8 months of MSFE betwee …
CGF-HLC-I repaired the bone defect repair of the rabbits mandible through tight junction pathway.
Mao Y, Hu M, Chen L, Chen X, Liu M, Zhang M, Nie M, Liu X. Mao Y, et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 20;10:976499. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.976499. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36204467 Free PMC article.
Nine New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups, normal control group, Bio-Gide/Bio-Oss and CGF-0.75%HLC-I/Bio-Oss group (n = 3, each group). CGF-0.75%HLC-I/Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide/Bio- …
Nine New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups, normal control group, Bio-Gide/Bio-Oss and C …
1,603 results