Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

115 results
Filters applied: . Clear all Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. Results by year timeline is unavailable
Page 1
A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care.
McKay J, Bradley N, Lough M, Bowie P. McKay J, et al. Among authors: bowie p. BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Sep 1;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-61. BMC Fam Pract. 2009. PMID: 19723325 Free PMC article.
However, non-medical staff were less likely to be involved in the changes resulting from event analyses describing patient harm (p < 0.05) CONCLUSION: The study provides some evidence of the potential of SEA to improve healthcare quality and safety. ...
However, non-medical staff were less likely to be involved in the changes resulting from event analyses describing patient harm (p &l …
First-line management of menorrhagia: findings from a survey of general practitioners in Forth Valley.
Turner E, Bowie P, McMullen KW, Kellock C. Turner E, et al. Among authors: bowie p. Br J Fam Plann. 2000 Oct;26(4):227-8. doi: 10.1783/147118900101194643. Br J Fam Plann. 2000. PMID: 11053882
Audit and non-principals: reported experiences in general practice.
Bowie P, Garvie A, Oliver J. Bowie P, et al. Health Bull (Edinb). 2001 Sep;59(5):335-9. Health Bull (Edinb). 2001. PMID: 12664748
Using audit to monitor and improve the quality of anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Simmons M, Bowie P, Heatley L. Simmons M, et al. Among authors: bowie p. Health Bull (Edinb). 1999 Sep;57(5):338-43. Health Bull (Edinb). 1999. PMID: 12811881

A subsequent re-audit of a further 87 patients showed a number of significant improvements: the overall use of general anaesthesia had fallen to 23.8 per cent from 53.0 per cent (P < 0.05); a noticeable reduction in the number of anaesthetic side-effects and complicatio

A subsequent re-audit of a further 87 patients showed a number of significant improvements: the overall use of general anaesthesia had falle …
Awareness and analysis of a significant event by general practitioners: a cross sectional survey.
Bowie P, McKay J, Norrie J, Lough M. Bowie P, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):102-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.006734. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004. PMID: 15069216 Free PMC article.
A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.
Bowie P, McKay J, Dalgetty E, Lough M. Bowie P, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):185-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010983. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005. PMID: 15933315 Free PMC article.
A pilot study of the feasibility of trainee hospital doctors undertaking significant event analysis.
McGregor JR, Bowie P, McKay J. McGregor JR, et al. Among authors: bowie p. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2005 Nov;66(11):638-41. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2005.66.11.20027. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2005. PMID: 16308959
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
McKay J, Bowie P, Lough M. McKay J, et al. Among authors: bowie p. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;12(6):622-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00630.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006. PMID: 17100861

GP registrars were significantly more likely than GP trainers (P < 0.001) and other established GP groups (P < 0.001) to gain a satisfactory peer review. GPs in non-training practices were less likely to achieve a satisfactory review than registrars (P

GP registrars were significantly more likely than GP trainers (P < 0.001) and other established GP groups (P < 0.001) to

Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses.
McKay J, Murphy DJ, Bowie P, Schmuck ML, Lough M, Eva KW. McKay J, et al. Among authors: bowie p. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):150-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020750. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007. PMID: 17403765 Free PMC article.
The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?
Bowie P, Cooke S, Lo P, McKay J, Lough M. Bowie P, et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;13(3):352-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00704.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007. PMID: 17518798
115 results
Jump to page
Feedback