Carter O - Search Results

1

Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review.

Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. Horvath JC, et al. Among authors: carter o. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:213-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Neuropsychologia. 2015. PMID: 25448853 Review.

2

Working memory load improves early stages of independent visual processing.

Cocchi L, Toepel U, De Lucia M, Martuzzi R, Wood SJ, Carter O, Murray MM. Cocchi L, et al. Among authors: carter o. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(1):92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.021. Epub 2010 Oct 23. Neuropsychologia. 2011. PMID: 20974157

3

Onset rivalry: the initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations.

Stanley J, Forte JD, Cavanagh P, Carter O. Stanley J, et al. Among authors: carter o. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Dec 5;5:140. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00140. eCollection 2011. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 22319483 Free PMC article.

4

Are patients with schizophrenia impaired in processing non-emotional features of human faces?

Darke H, Peterman JS, Park S, Sundram S, Carter O. Darke H, et al. Among authors: carter o. Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 20;4:529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00529. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23970872 Free PMC article.

5

Using ambiguous plaid stimuli to investigate the influence of immediate prior experience on perception.

Carter O, Snyder JS, Fung S, Rubin N. Carter O, et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):133-47. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0547-5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014. PMID: 24101343 Clinical Trial.

6

Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be).

Horvath JC, Carter O, Forte JD. Horvath JC, et al. Among authors: carter o. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Jan 24;8:2. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002. eCollection 2014. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24478640 Free PMC article. Review.

7

Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. Horvath JC, et al. Among authors: carter o. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):535-50. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Brain Stimul. 2015. PMID: 25701175 Review.

8

Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Horvath JC, Vogrin SJ, Carter O, Cook MJ, Forte JD. Horvath JC, et al. Among authors: carter o. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8. Epub 2016 May 5. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27150317

9

Medical risks: Regulate devices for brain stimulation.

Carter O, Forte J. Carter O, et al. Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):179. doi: 10.1038/533179d. Nature. 2016. PMID: 27172037 No abstract available.

10

No significant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) found on simple motor reaction time comparing 15 different simulation protocols.

Horvath JC, Carter O, Forte JD. Horvath JC, et al. Among authors: carter o. Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:544-552. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Sep 21. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 27664296 Clinical Trial.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results