Davis DL - Search Results

1

Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children.

Gandhi OP, Morgan LL, de Salles AA, Han YY, Herberman RB, Davis DL. Gandhi OP, et al. Among authors: davis dl. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Mar;31(1):34-51. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2011.622827. Epub 2011 Oct 14. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012. PMID: 21999884 Review.

2

Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (review).

Morgan LL, Miller AB, Sasco A, Davis DL. Morgan LL, et al. Among authors: davis dl. Int J Oncol. 2015 May;46(5):1865-71. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2908. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Int J Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25738972 Review.

3

Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality.

Fernández C, de Salles AA, Sears ME, Morris RD, Davis DL. Fernández C, et al. Among authors: davis dl. Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:694-699. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Environ Res. 2018. PMID: 29884550

4

Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102).

Miller AB, Morgan LL, Udasin I, Davis DL. Miller AB, et al. Among authors: davis dl. Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:673-683. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043. Epub 2018 Sep 6. Environ Res. 2018. PMID: 30196934 Review.

5

Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices.

Miller AB, Sears ME, Morgan LL, Davis DL, Hardell L, Oremus M, Soskolne CL. Miller AB, et al. Among authors: davis dl. Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 13;7:223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223. eCollection 2019. Front Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31457001 Free PMC article. Review.

6

A meta-analysis of in vitro exposures to weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phones (1990-2015).

Halgamuge MN, Skafidas E, Davis D. Halgamuge MN, et al. Environ Res. 2020 May;184:109227. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109227. Epub 2020 Feb 13. Environ Res. 2020. PMID: 32199316

7

Proteomic analysis of continuous 900-MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in testicular tissue: a rat model of human cell phone exposure.

Sepehrimanesh M, Kazemipour N, Saeb M, Nazifi S, Davis DL. Sepehrimanesh M, et al. Among authors: davis dl. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 May;24(15):13666-13673. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8882-z. Epub 2017 Apr 10. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28397118

8

The genomic effects of cell phone exposure on the reproductive system.

Yahyazadeh A, Deniz ÖG, Kaplan AA, Altun G, Yurt KK, Davis D. Yahyazadeh A, et al. Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:684-693. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Environ Res. 2018. PMID: 29884549 Review.

9

Association of mobile phone use with adult brain cancer remains plausible.

Davis DL, Miller AB, Philips A. Davis DL, et al. BMJ. 2012 May 1;344:e3083; author reply e3088. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3083. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22549065 No abstract available.

10

Lessons learned from the application of machine learning to studies on plant response to radio-frequency.

Halgamuge MN, Davis D. Halgamuge MN, et al. Environ Res. 2019 Nov;178:108634. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108634. Epub 2019 Aug 16. Environ Res. 2019. PMID: 31450151

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

446 results

Search Page

Filters