Davis KG - Search Results

1

The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: underlying methodological issues.

Davis KG, Heaney CA. Davis KG, et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Jul;15(6):389-406. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00101-1. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000. PMID: 10771118 Review.

2

Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions.

Granata KP, Marras WS, Davis KG. Granata KP, et al. Among authors: davis kg. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Jul;14(6):367-75. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00004-2. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999. PMID: 10521617

3

Variability in spine loading model performance.

Marras WS, Granta KP, Davis KG. Marras WS, et al. Among authors: davis kg. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Oct;14(8):505-14. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)90090-0. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999. PMID: 10521634 Clinical Trial.

4

Spine loading characteristics of patients with low back pain compared with asymptomatic individuals.

Marras WS, Davis KG, Ferguson SA, Lucas BR, Gupta P. Marras WS, et al. Among authors: davis kg. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2566-74. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11725237

5

Biomechanical assessment of lifting dynamics, muscle activity and spinal loads while using three different styles of lifting belt.

Granata KP, Marras WS, Davis KG. Granata KP, et al. Among authors: davis kg. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997 Mar;12(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(96)00052-6. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997. PMID: 11415679

6

The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on mechanical loading of the lumbar spine.

Marras WS, Davis KG, Heaney CA, Maronitis AB, Allread WG. Marras WS, et al. Among authors: davis kg. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 1;25(23):3045-54. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00012. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. PMID: 11145816

7

The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics.

Davis KG, Marras WS. Davis KG, et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Dec;15(10):703-17. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00035-8. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000. PMID: 11050352 Review.

8

Assessment of the relationship between box weight and trunk kinematics: does a reduction in box weight necessarily correspond to a decrease in spinal loading?

Davis KG, Marras WS. Davis KG, et al. Hum Factors. 2000 Summer;42(2):195-208. doi: 10.1518/001872000779656499. Hum Factors. 2000. PMID: 11022880

9

Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions.

Marras WS, Jorgensen MJ, Davis KG. Marras WS, et al. Among authors: davis kg. Ergonomics. 2000 May;43(5):653-68. doi: 10.1080/001401300184314. Ergonomics. 2000. PMID: 10877482 Clinical Trial.

10

An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.

Davis KG, Jorgensen MJ, Marras WS. Davis KG, et al. Ergonomics. 2000 Feb;43(2):143-59. doi: 10.1080/001401300184521. Ergonomics. 2000. PMID: 10675055 Clinical Trial.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Search Page

Search Results