Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

317 results
Filters applied: . Clear all Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. Results by year timeline is unavailable
Page 1
Adverse effects of screening mammography.
Feig SA. Feig SA. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 Sep;42(5):807-19, v. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.013. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004. PMID: 15337417 Review.
Risk of risk-based mammography screening, ages 40 to 49. American College of Radiology Task Force on Breast Cancer.
Bassett LW, Cardenosa G, D'Orsi CJ, Dempsey PJ, Dershaw DD, Destouet JM, Evans WP 3rd, Feig SA, Hendrick RE, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, Linver MN, Mendelson EB, Monsees B, Racenstein MJ, Sickles EA, Stelling CB, Warren L. Bassett LW, et al. Among authors: feig sa. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;17(2):735-8. J Clin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10080624 No abstract available.
False positive rate of screening mammography.
Kopans DB, Feig SA. Kopans DB, et al. Among authors: feig sa. N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 20;339(8):562-4. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9714625 No abstract available.
Imaging of the radiographically dense breast.
Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Jackson VP, et al. Among authors: feig sa. Radiology. 1993 Aug;188(2):297-301. doi: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327668. Radiology. 1993. PMID: 8327668 Review.
An introduction to economic issues in breast imaging.
Farria D, Feig SA. Farria D, et al. Among authors: feig sa. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):825-42. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70203-7. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000. PMID: 10943280 Review.
317 results