Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

MyNCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1926 1
1929 1
1932 1
1934 1
1937 1
1938 1
1939 1
1943 1
1947 5
1948 1
1949 2
1950 1
1951 5
1952 3
1953 6
1954 3
1955 2
1956 2
1957 4
1958 2
1959 1
1960 2
1961 4
1962 1
1963 1
1964 4
1965 1
1966 2
1967 7
1968 2
1969 4
1970 8
1971 9
1972 4
1973 6
1974 3
1975 4
1976 5
1977 13
1978 10
1979 9
1980 11
1981 15
1982 15
1983 18
1984 19
1985 13
1986 14
1987 22
1988 11
1989 17
1990 13
1991 21
1992 18
1993 23
1994 28
1995 19
1996 33
1997 31
1998 19
1999 23
2000 24
2001 21
2002 18
2003 17
2004 27
2005 15
2006 27
2007 26
2008 30
2009 30
2010 30
2011 35
2012 40
2013 43
2014 37
2015 46
2016 35
2017 38
2018 43
2019 35
2020 7
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

1,069 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Effect of a Strategy of Initial Laryngeal Tube Insertion vs Endotracheal Intubation on 72-Hour Survival in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Wang HE, et al. JAMA 2018 - Clinical Trial. Among authors: Gray RE, Gray PC. PMID 30167699 Free PMC article.
Seventy-two hour survival was 18.3% in the LT group vs 15.4% in the ETI group (adjusted difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 0.2%-5.6%]; P = .04). Secondary outcomes in the LT group vs ETI group were return of spontaneous circulation (27.9% vs 24.3%; adjusted difference, 3.6% [95% CI, 0.3%-6.8%]; P = .03); hospital survival (10.8% vs 8.1%; adjusted difference, 2.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-4.8%]; P = .01); and favorable neurological status at discharge (7.1% vs 5.0%; adjusted difference, 2.1% [95% CI, 0.3%-3.8%]; P = .02). ...
Seventy-two hour survival was 18.3% in the LT group vs 15.4% in the ETI group (adjusted difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 0.2%-5.6%]; P = .04 …
Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Kudenchuk PJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2016 - Clinical Trial. Among authors: Gray R, Gray PC. PMID 27043165 Free article.
The difference in survival rate for amiodarone versus placebo was 3.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.4 to 7.0; P=0.08); for lidocaine versus placebo, 2.6 percentage points (95% CI, -1.0 to 6.3; P=0.16); and for amiodarone versus lidocaine, 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, -3.2 to 4.7; P=0.70). ...There was heterogeneity of treatment effect with respect to whether the arrest was witnessed (P=0.05); active drugs were associated with a survival rate that was significantly higher than the rate with placebo among patients with bystander-witnessed arrest but not among those with unwitnessed arrest. ...
The difference in survival rate for amiodarone versus placebo was 3.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.4 to 7.0; P
1,069 results
Jump to page
Feedback