Background: The success of Mohs micrographic surgery depends on the surgeon's ability to correctly interpret intraoperative frozen sections.
Objective: This retrospective study analyzed the rate of concordance between Mohs surgeons and dermatopathologists in reading slides from Mohs surgery cases.
Methods: A dermatopathologist reviewed all the frozen sections and the corresponding Mohs map for every 30th Mohs case at a practice employing 6 different Mohs surgeons during 2001-2017. Cases in which the dermatopathologist and the Mohs surgeon disagreed on the interpretation were noted.
Results: The concordance rate between Mohs surgeons and dermatopathologists was 99.79%. The 3 discordant cases included a case of squamous cell carcinoma, a case of superficial basal cell carcinoma, and a case of hypertrophic squamous cell carcinoma in situ.
Limitations: This analysis is limited to fellowship-trained Mohs surgeons and, therefore, might not be applicable to all physicians who perform Mohs.
Conclusion: Fellowship-trained Mohs surgeons show high concordance with board-certified dermatopathologists in the accurate and precise interpretation of histology slides in the setting of Mohs micrographic surgery.
Keywords: Mohs; cutaneous oncology; dermatopathology; medical dermatology; melanoma; nonmelanoma skin cancer.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.