Lagnado DA - Search Results

1

A general structure for legal arguments about evidence using Bayesian networks.

Fenton N, Neil M, Lagnado DA. Fenton N, et al. Among authors: lagnado da. Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):61-102. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12004. Epub 2012 Oct 30. Cogn Sci. 2013. PMID: 23110576 Free article.

2

When 'neutral' evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case).

Fenton N, Berger D, Lagnado D, Neil M, Hsu A. Fenton N, et al. Sci Justice. 2014 Jul;54(4):274-87. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 16. Sci Justice. 2014. PMID: 25002045 Free article.

3

Response to "on the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al.".

Fenton N, Lagnado D, Hsu A, Berger D, Neil M. Fenton N, et al. Sci Justice. 2014 Jul;54(4):319-20. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.005. Sci Justice. 2014. PMID: 25002052 No abstract available.

4

Modelling crime linkage with Bayesian networks.

de Zoete J, Sjerps M, Lagnado D, Fenton N. de Zoete J, et al. Sci Justice. 2015 May;55(3):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Sci Justice. 2015. PMID: 25934374

5

Using Bayesian networks to guide the assessment of new evidence in an appeal case.

Smit NM, Lagnado DA, Morgan RM, Fenton NE. Smit NM, et al. Among authors: lagnado da. Crime Sci. 2016 May 25;5(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40163-016-0057-6. Crime Sci. 2016. PMID: 27376015 Free PMC article.

6

The Zero-Sum Fallacy in Evidence Evaluation.

Pilditch TD, Fenton N, Lagnado D. Pilditch TD, et al. Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;30(2):250-260. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818484. Epub 2018 Dec 31. Psychol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30597122

7

Analyzing the Simonshaven Case Using Bayesian Networks.

Fenton N, Neil M, Yet B, Lagnado D. Fenton N, et al. Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;12(4):1092-1114. doi: 10.1111/tops.12417. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Top Cogn Sci. 2020. PMID: 30861325 Free article.

8

Resolving the so-called "probabilistic paradoxes in legal reasoning" with Bayesian networks.

de Zoete J, Fenton N, Noguchi T, Lagnado D. de Zoete J, et al. Sci Justice. 2019 Jul;59(4):367-379. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Sci Justice. 2019. PMID: 31256808

9

Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging.

Neil M, Fenton N, Lagnado D, Gill RD. Neil M, et al. Artif Intell Law (Dordr). 2019;27(4):403-430. doi: 10.1007/s10506-019-09250-3. Epub 2019 Mar 27. Artif Intell Law (Dordr). 2019. PMID: 32269421 Free PMC article.

10

Dependencies in evidential reports: The case for informational advantages.

Pilditch TD, Hahn U, Fenton N, Lagnado D. Pilditch TD, et al. Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104343. Epub 2020 Jun 26. Cognition. 2020. PMID: 32599310

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

76 results

Search Page