Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2009 1
2011 1
2012 3
2013 3
2014 2
2015 2
2016 1
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
2022 4
2023 6
2024 1
2025 1
2026 0

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

31 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Did you mean fractures validation (12,755 results)?
Derivation and validation of the CFracture competing risk fracture prediction tool compared with QFracture in older people and people with comorbidity: a population cohort study.
Livingstone SJ, Guthrie B, McMinn M, Eke C, Donnan PT, Morales DR. Livingstone SJ, et al. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023 Jan;4(1):e43-e53. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00290-2. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023. PMID: 36610448 Free article.
The aim of this study was to derive and validate a competing risk model to predict major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture (CFracture) and compare its performance with that of QFracture in UK primary care. ...In a separate validation cohort, we examined …
The aim of this study was to derive and validate a competing risk model to predict major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture (CFra …
Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Chakhtoura M, Cauley JA, Chamoun N. El-Hajj Fuleihan G, et al. J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):397-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19. J Clin Densitom. 2017. PMID: 28734709 Review.
To-date, forty eight risk assessment tools that allow risk stratification of patients are available, however only few are externally validated and tested in a population-based setting. These include Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool; Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument …
To-date, forty eight risk assessment tools that allow risk stratification of patients are available, however only few are externally vali …
Effect of competing mortality risks on predictive performance of the QFracture risk prediction tool for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture: external validation cohort study in a UK primary care population.
Livingstone SJ, Morales DR, McMinn M, Eke C, Donnan P, Guthrie B. Livingstone SJ, et al. BMJ Med. 2022 Oct 25;1(1):e000316. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000316. eCollection 2022. BMJ Med. 2022. PMID: 36936595 Free PMC article.
OBJECTIVE: To externally evaluate the QFracture risk prediction tool for predicting the risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. ...The use of QFracture in its current form needs to be reviewed, particularly in people at high risk of death from other ca …
OBJECTIVE: To externally evaluate the QFracture risk prediction tool for predicting the risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip f …
Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Hippisley-Cox J, et al. BMJ. 2012 May 22;344:e3427. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3427. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22619194
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an updated version of the QFracture algorithm for estimating the risk of a patient sustaining an osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture in a primary care population. DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study using routinely collected da …
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an updated version of the QFracture algorithm for estimating the risk of a patient sustaini …
External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
Dagan N, Cohen-Stavi C, Leventer-Roberts M, Balicer RD. Dagan N, et al. BMJ. 2017 Jan 19;356:i6755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6755. BMJ. 2017. PMID: 28104610 Free PMC article.
OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the performance and externally validate the three most studied prediction tools for osteoporotic fractures-QFracture, FRAX, and Garvan-using data from electronic health records. ...This performance gap was more pronounced in previous …
OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the performance and externally validate the three most studied prediction tools for osteoporotic frac …
Fracture prediction tools in diabetes.
Agarwal A, Leslie WD. Agarwal A, et al. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2022 Aug 1;29(4):326-332. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000734. Epub 2022 Jun 24. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2022. PMID: 35749735 Review.
RECENT FINDINGS: The Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool, Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC), and QFracture tool are validated tools for fracture risk prediction. FRAX is most widely used internationally, and considers T1D (but not T2D) under secondary osteoporo …
RECENT FINDINGS: The Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool, Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC), and QFracture tool are validated …
Improving Recognition of Fracture Risk in People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Performance and Model Contribution of Two Common Risk Assessment Tools.
Vizcarra P, Moreno A, Vivancos MJ, García AM, González RP, Gutiérrez F, Mata DC, Galindo P, Calzado S, Casado JL. Vizcarra P, et al. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2023 Jan;37(1):11-21. doi: 10.1089/apc.2022.0183. Epub 2022 Dec 23. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2023. PMID: 36576916
The survival estimates of fragility fractures during follow-up were calculated and FRAX and QFracture scores were computed at cohort inclusion. For both tools, discriminatory measures and the observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios were assessed. ...The O/E was 1.67 for FRAX and …
The survival estimates of fragility fractures during follow-up were calculated and FRAX and QFracture scores were computed at cohort …
Development and Validation of a Risk Score to Predict the First Hip Fracture in the Oldest Old: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lam MT, Sing CW, Li GHY, Kung AWC, Tan KCB, Cheung CL. Lam MT, et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Apr 17;75(5):980-986. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz178. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 31353417
A five-factor risk score (the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study [HKOS] score) for incident hip fracture was derived and validated, and its predictive accuracy was evaluated and compared with other risk scores. ...In the validation cohort, the HKOS score had a C-statistic …
A five-factor risk score (the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study [HKOS] score) for incident hip fracture was derived and validated, and its …
Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Beaudoin C, Moore L, Gagné M, Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP, Jean S. Beaudoin C, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):721-740. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04919-6. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Osteoporos Int. 2019. PMID: 30877348
The results of this systematic review suggest that QFracture, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) with BMD, and Garvan with BMD are the tools with the best discriminative ability. ...Gender, mean age, age range, and study quality were used as adjustment variables. RESULTS …
The results of this systematic review suggest that QFracture, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) with BMD, and Garvan with BMD are …
31 results