Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2013 1
2014 1
2017 1
2018 2
2021 0
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

3 results
Results by year

Citations

1 article found by citation matching

Search results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clementini M, Rossetti PH, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela WC, Canullo L. Clementini M, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Mar;43(3):323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 25. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24373525 Review.
The aim of this study was to determine the influence of patient-related systemic risk factors (systemic disease, genetic traits, chronic drug or alcohol consumption, and smoking status) on peri-implant bone loss at least 1 y …
The aim of this study was to determine the influence of patient-related systemic risk factors (systemic disease, …
Peri-implantitis: A Comprehensive Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Ting M, Craig J, Balkin BE, Suzuki JB. Ting M, et al. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Jun;44(3):225-247. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00122. Epub 2017 Nov 28. J Oral Implantol. 2018. PMID: 29182489 Review.
The objective of this systematic review was to perform a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to peri-implantitis in humans, including the prevalence and incidence, the diagnostic findings, microbial findings …
The objective of this systematic review was to perform a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews and meta-a …
Is osteoporosis a risk factor for implant survival or failure?
Grisa A, Veitz-Keenan A. Grisa A, et al. Evid Based Dent. 2018 Jun;19(2):51-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401307. Evid Based Dent. 2018. PMID: 29930358
The smallest diameter used was 3.3 mm and the shortest implant length was 7 mm.The relative risk (RR) of implant failure and mean marginal bone loss were analysed within a 95% confidence interval (CI). ...Data heterogeneity was low. An increase …
The smallest diameter used was 3.3 mm and the shortest implant length was 7 mm.The relative risk (RR) of implant failur …