Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1915 1
1921 1
1922 1
1925 1
1927 1
1928 1
1930 4
1931 5
1932 1
1933 1
1934 1
1936 1
1937 1
1938 1
1939 1
1940 1
1942 1
1943 2
1944 1
1945 5
1946 12
1947 11
1948 6
1949 9
1950 4
1951 16
1952 26
1953 27
1954 47
1955 49
1956 29
1957 36
1958 47
1959 45
1960 51
1961 46
1962 54
1963 67
1964 93
1965 85
1966 108
1967 92
1968 105
1969 135
1970 152
1971 162
1972 181
1973 217
1974 215
1975 784
1976 840
1977 848
1978 856
1979 1022
1980 1047
1981 1187
1982 1292
1983 1604
1984 1707
1985 1870
1986 2036
1987 2287
1988 2465
1989 3186
1990 3297
1991 3488
1992 3888
1993 4071
1994 4539
1995 4832
1996 5317
1997 5785
1998 6098
1999 6597
2000 7033
2001 7757
2002 8699
2003 9331
2004 10286
2005 10994
2006 11955
2007 13544
2008 14557
2009 15888
2010 15833
2011 16867
2012 18559
2013 20441
2014 20765
2015 21361
2016 19759
2017 19484
2018 20863
2019 21851
2020 23677
2021 25459
2022 23767
2023 21585
2024 24868
2025 29107
2026 7117
2027 1

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

478,033 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.
Buderer NM. Buderer NM. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;3(9):895-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03538.x. Acad Emerg Med. 1996. PMID: 8870764 Free article. Review.
Careful consideration of statistical issues related to the choice of a sample size is critical for achieving meaningful results in research studies designed to evaluate diagnostic tests. When assessing the ability of a diagnostic test to screen for disease, the para …
Careful consideration of statistical issues related to the choice of a sample size is critical for achieving meaningful results in resear …
Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
Hajian-Tilaki K. Hajian-Tilaki K. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26. J Biomed Inform. 2014. PMID: 24582925 Free article.
OBJECTIVES: This review provided a conceptual framework of sample size calculations in the studies of diagnostic test accuracy in various conditions and test outcomes. METHODS: The formulae of sample size calculations for estimation of adequate sensitivity/ …
OBJECTIVES: This review provided a conceptual framework of sample size calculations in the studies of diagnostic test accuracy in var …
Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Chassé M, Fergusson DA. Chassé M, et al. Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;49(2):87-93. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Semin Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30819399 Review.
However, the study designs traditionally used to determine whether such a diagnostic test is indeed accurate, safe, and effective are often at a higher risk of bias and are of lower methodological quality than those evaluating efficacy of therapeutic interventions. ...
However, the study designs traditionally used to determine whether such a diagnostic test is indeed accurate, safe, and effective are …
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: review of methods with applications in diagnostic medicine.
Obuchowski NA, Bullen JA. Obuchowski NA, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2018 Mar 29;63(7):07TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab4b1. Phys Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 29512515 Review.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is a tool used to describe the discrimination accuracy of a diagnostic test or prediction model. While sensitivity and specificity are the basic metrics of accuracy, they have many limitations when chara …
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is a tool used to describe the discrimination accuracy of a diagnostic test or predi …
The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.
Richman J, Zangalli C, Lu L, Wizov SS, Spaeth E, Spaeth GL. Richman J, et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;99(1):16-20. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305223. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25053760
AIMS: (1) To determine the ability of a novel, internet-based contrast sensitivity test titled the Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test (SPARCS) to identify patients with glaucoma. (2) To determine the test-retest reliability of SPARCS. ... …
AIMS: (1) To determine the ability of a novel, internet-based contrast sensitivity test titled the Spaeth/Richman Contrast …
Sample size.
Elston DM. Elston DM. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Oct;79(4):635. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 8. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29128456 No abstract available.
What are sensitivity and specificity?
Swift A, Heale R, Twycross A. Swift A, et al. Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Jan;23(1):2-4. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103225. Epub 2019 Nov 12. Evid Based Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31719126 No abstract available.
Introduction to diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Sitch AJ, Dekkers OM, Scholefield BR, Takwoingi Y. Sitch AJ, et al. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021 Feb;184(2):E5-E9. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-1239. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33410763
Researchers need to understand the implications of their chosen design, opting for comparative designs where possible. Researchers should analyse test accuracy studies using the appropriate methods, acknowledging the uncertainty of results and avoiding overstating c …
Researchers need to understand the implications of their chosen design, opting for comparative designs where possible. Researchers sh …
Placebo misconceptions.
Senn S. Senn S. Am J Bioeth. 2009 Sep;9(9):53-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160903098283. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998195 No abstract available.
Statistical correctness.
Sarmiento A. Sarmiento A. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Aug;15(6):455-6; author reply 457-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200108000-00016. J Orthop Trauma. 2001. PMID: 11514778 No abstract available.
478,033 results
You have reached the last available page of results. Please see the User Guide for more information.