Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2012 2
2013 1
2015 1
2020 0
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

3 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Effectiveness of dry needling for the treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study.
Dıraçoğlu D, Vural M, Karan A, Aksoy C. Dıraçoğlu D, et al. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(4):285-90. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0338. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012. PMID: 23220812 Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that dry needling is more effective than sham dry needling in relieving myofascial pain of the temporomandibular muscles. ...There were no differences between the two groups in term …
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that dry needling is more effective than sham dry needling
The effect of dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.
Tekin L, Akarsu S, Durmuş O, Cakar E, Dinçer U, Kıralp MZ. Tekin L, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;32(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3. Epub 2012 Nov 9. Clin Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23138883 Clinical Trial.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that dry needling is more effective than sham dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). This was a prospective, double-blinded
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that dry needling is more effective than sham dry need
Ischemic Compression After Dry Needling of a Latent Myofascial Trigger Point Reduces Postneedling Soreness Intensity and Duration.
Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, Pecos-Martin D, Rodríguez-Fernández ÁL, Alguacil-Diego IM, Portillo-Aceituno A, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Fernandez-Carnero J. Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, et al. PM R. 2015 Oct;7(10):1026-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Mar 31. PM R. 2015. PMID: 25836591 Clinical Trial.
DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 72-hour follow-up. SETTING: A university community. PARTICIPANTS: Asymptomatic volunteers (N = 90: 40 men and 50 women) aged 18 to 39 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: …
DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 72-hour follow-up. SETTING: A un …
Feedback